Destined
for greatness, Alexander (Farrell) was told by his mother Olympias
(Jolie) he would rule the world. After the death of his father
Phillip (Kilmer) at the hands of the Persians, Alexander started
a seven-year campaign of conquest that would see the Macedonian
Kingdom engulf the entire known world.
After Oscar success
with Gladiator, the sword and sandals epic has found a new lease
of life but does Alexander have what it takes to conqueror the
box office or will it die in battle? The answer is that it gets
stabbed repeatedly and dies a bloody and painful death.
With a wealth of
material about one of the most powerful men in the ancient world,
Alexander just isn’t interesting enough to hold your attention
for almost three hours. The film charts the life of the great
leader, through childhood to his early death at thirty-three,
showing his raise to power and his military campaign to bring
the known world under his rule. The problem with the film is
that he we only see his military tactical genius at work once.
Taking on 250,000
Persians, Alexander takes the fight to them and claims an epic
victory. This is vividly brought to live on the screen but the
problem is that you are not that impressed with what you are
seeing. As special effects technology gives the filmmaker the
chance to recreate any epic confrontation with all the scope
and grandeur that these would have looked like at the time but
you can’t help but think you’ve seen this all before
and much better. Oliver Stone makes the mistake of taking the
camera far too close to the action for the majority of the battle.
While this is all fine and good when showing what is happening
to the lead characters and the horrors of battle but this takes
away a lot of the scale of the confrontation, making the fight
seem smaller than it actually was.
Leading the production
is Colin Farrell as Alexander. Still Hollywood’s golden
boy, Farrell does his best with the material but seems to be
lacking something that would command respect and loyalty of
his army. This is a man that people would follow to the ends
of the earth but Farrell just doesn’t convey this on film.
You can’t just put your finger on what it missing but
it really does something to the believability of the character
and the film. Angelina Jolie has the strongest part in the movie
but doesn’t get the screen time necessary to convey Olympias’s
more interesting characteristics. We don’t get to know
much about her background, her turbulent relationship with Phillip
and what happened to her during Alexander’s campaign.
As the older Ptolemy, Anthony Hopkins provides the narration
for the piece as he dictates the history of Alexander’s
life in the Egyptian city of Alexandria. Val Kilmer does a good
job as King Phillip, Alexander’s father and inspiration.
He is the man that Alexander drives to be better than. Jared
Leto plays Hephaistion, Alexander best friend and the only person
he ever trusted and loved. Rosario Dawson has little to do as
Roxane other than look beautiful and treat Alexander with contempt.
Oliver Stone has
always been an interesting director, providing his own take
on historical events but with Alexander he has gone a little
too far. Interpreting history for his own dramatical needs,
he makes Alexander a bi-sexual, a conqueror who sees everyone
as equal and a misunderstood visionary who was millennia ahead
of his time in his political thinking. Some these points may
be accurate but it is the way they are delivered that makes
you question the film’s validity. In parts, the dialogue
is appalling and almost cringe-worthy. At times you feel sorry
for cast have to deliver it. He copes with the epic scale of
the production well, as you’d expect, as the film is a
visual feast in parts but with modern productions values and
the amount of money spent on the production you wouldn’t
expect anything less. It is the other factors that bring the
movie down.
The story of Alexander
had so much cinematic potential but what we have here is a missed
opportunity that is killed by sheer over indulgence. As he co-wrote,
produced and directed the film, the blame for this mess falls
squarely at the feet of Oliver Stone. Alexander may have conquered
most of the ancient world but he will have real trouble making
any kind of impression on the modern one.
Star Rating = * *
Director’s
Cut
After the failure
of the theatrical cut of the film at the box office, director
Oliver Stone has gone back to the film and tried to sort out
some of the critical problems posed by the movie’s original
release. Unlike most directors’ cuts, this is not a longer
version but is in fact shorter that the original release.
The main change is
that he has changes the structure of the film. Now we spend
much less time in Greece and exploring Alexander’s child
and young adulthood. These scenes are still there but have now
been moved to the latter half of the movie as Alexander remembers
his childhood and family problems. So now the film arrives at
the first battle scene far quicker, allowing the audience to
see him in action much quicker.
The major removal
the storyline of Alexander and Hephaistion love affair. The
bisexual side of Alexander’s character is played down
more in this version, to appeal more to the less liberal American
market but they have re-included the traditional dates of the
piece even though the American test audiences could understand
that 320 BC was earlier that 340 BC.
The Big question
is that ‘Does this version improve the film?’ and
the answer is yes but only slightly. The problems that plighted
the original are still there, bad dialogue, a lack of battles
and the many overindulgences by the writer and director but
at least now they have a structure that make them a lot more
watchable. The film still isn’t up to the standard of
Gladiator (still the best picture in the current resurgence
of historical epics) but it now at least a lot more enjoyable.
Star Rating = * *
*
PICTURE & SOUND
Presented in Anamorphic
Widescreen 2.40:1 with Dolby Digital 5.1, the movie is presented
extremely well.
BONUS FEATURES
Director’s
Cut
Commentary by Director
Oliver Stone
The new version gets a commentary from the director who still
tries to emphasise that this is one of this best movies. There
is nothing wrong with enthusiasm for a project and to be far
he does point out the changes he has made and the reasons behind
them. He talks extensively about the Maltese shoot, the cast
and the characters. He also talks about the historical facts
that the film is based upon and how difficult it was to track
down fact about Alexander. This is a good commentary from a
passionate director. While he doesn’t criticise himself
enough, the still is humble enough to say what didn’t
work and what he did to fix it.
OVERALL
The single disc Director’s
cut of the film isn’t as feature packed as the theatrical
version release and this is a shame. The buyer should have had
the choice of having the extras disc with this version as well
and not having to buy or rent both versions to see the Director’s
different visions. The commentary track is good however but
the lack of anything else is a shame. Buy the Theatrical Version
if you are a fan.
DVD Star Rating =
* *
Theatrical Version
Disc One:
Audio commentary
with Oliver Stone
Disc Two:
Audio commentary
by Oliver Stone and historian/Alexander biographer Robin Lane
Fox
'Resurrecting Alexander'
feature
'Perfect Is The Ebemy Of God' feature
'The Death Of Alexander'
feature
Teaser trailer
Theatrical trailer
Weblink to the online
world of Alexander The Great