London
Underground. Those two words are enough to bring savage feelings
of horror, scorn and derision from any self-respecting Londoner
and while it may not be the best place for efficient travel
around the capital it certainly makes for a very inviting location
to shoot a horror film. Which must have been just what director
Christopher Smith was thinking when he made this strangely uninvolving
tale. Our protagonist, Kate (Franka Potente), leaves a party
in pursuit of some nocturnal loving but after a night boozing
and a few puffs on the old Mary Jane she falls asleep at Charing
Cross tube station (we’ve all done it) and awakes to find
herself trapped underground with a murderous unseen assailant
prowling the tunnels intent on killing her. Just another typical
Friday night in London then, you might say, but while a Friday
night in London has the potential to engage and amuse, this
film does neither.
The idea is intriguing
and the place certainly has the right ambience to make a horror
film, with it’s empty but threatening passages and subterranean
tunnels, but, while Smith makes the blood occasionally run luke-warm
with some pretty smart shots of the empty tube station the actual
film feels, much like the disused tunnels, rather hollow. As
for providing scares, I might say I was more frightened by Care
Bears: The Movie than I was by this; the central ghoul, if that’s
what he is, looks like a demented, hairless Lemony Snicket with
a penchant for human organs, but he does look a bit on the thin
side so maybe he could do with the protein.
The characterisation
in the film is pretty poor, leaving us hardly rooting for the
heroine or feeling any sympathy for the predator or his prey.
It doesn’t compete as just a generic slasher flick either,
but it does display some of it’s traits – the female
heroine, the subjugation and mutilation of the fairer sex and
the inevitable chase scenes down darkened, claustrophobic spaces
- however unlike the great slasher flicks of old the reasons
behind this central demon’s undertakings are never fully
explained. Now why should they, you say, perhaps it makes it
even more fearful if the methods behind the madness are left
unknown. Very true, but the film feels like it wants to explain
it. Dotted about the madman’s subterranean dungeon are
framed photograph’s of a figure in a white doctor’s
jacket, with a strange looking child next to him who one can
only presume is Mr Snicket himself. Perhaps he is only doing
this because of some heinous Peeping Tom style experiments conducted
by his father (see DVD extras for the full explanation behind
this). Possibly, but it is never elucidated and in all honesty
I didn’t really care how he got to be like he did because
I felt no empathy for him at all. I felt more empathy for the
two wayward smack heads that live in a cave behind the walls.
Poor little Mandy, left for dead by the selfish tyranny of evil
Kate, but after a short while, I was soon rooting for their
deaths as well. The actual deaths do appear quite graphically
and the effects look fairly real, but we’re not talking
anything particularly spectacular here, it’s no real-time
man to werewolf metamorphosis, just a bit of aptly done gore.
It’s a shame
considering this is an Anglo-Germanic production that it couldn’t
have rested alongside the mantel with the recent spate of new
wave horrors from Asia that have whet our appetites after Wes
Craven’s reinvention of the genre with Scream became a
parody of it’s own parodying. Sadly rather than a sense
of national pride we are left with the image of a dejected and
vagabonded Kate, traumatised and shaken after the events of
the film, unable to comprehend what has just happened to her.
I must admit I felt the same. I think the film would have scored
more favourably if they had substituted the female lead with
our very own Ken Livingstone. Now that’s a film I’d
like to see.
Audio/Visual
The film is presented
in 1.85:1 Anamorphic Widescreen with a Dolby Digital 5.1 soundtrack.
Both are good quality, with the dreary sounds echoing from the
subterranean tunnels clearly heard and the image down the darkened
corridors being crisp and clear.
Extras
Subtitles
Commentary with director
Christopher Smith
Making of Creep
The cast, crew and director talk about how they made the film
and what their aims and goals were. Christopher Smith talks
about his influences being the slasher and horror flicks of
the 1970’s like ‘I Spit On Your Grave’. It’s
hard to see these influences in the finished film though.
Production Design
Featurette
The set designers talk about how the film was shot on location
in London and on various sets designed in Germany, like the
underground laboratory and the Creeps’ submerged dungeon.
Makeup Featurette
Probably the most interesting of the three featurettes, as the
films effects are realistic enough and admirably done. We are
informed that the special effects are the first to be made from
silicon prosthetics, which are very durable and lightweight,
so now you know.
Frightfest Q &
A
Director and star discuss some pretty mundane questions with
some pretty mundane people.
Alternative Titles
You can click through a list of names that could have been.
Like ‘Here Kitty Kitty’ and ‘Piccadilly Nightmare’.
My particular favourite was ‘Horunden’. Nope I don’t
know what it means either.
Alternative Beginning
Interestingly and lamentably Smith tells us that he only storyboarded
this beginning and that it never got filmed. It concerns the
Creep and offers an explanation into his past. It’s a
crying shame really as the film would have been given a greater
coherency had they included this and it would have helped the
audience to empathise with the Creep character, which Smith
keeps telling us is what he wanted.
Alternative Ending
Again this ending was never shot and in my opinion it’s
better than the current one, but Smith says they didn’t
have the budget to pull it off effectively. It’s a shame
because if they had gone with both this and the alternative
beginning, it would have been a better film. Oh well, we live,
we learn.