Having
a crisis of faith after witnessing the evils of man during the
Second World War, Lankester Merrin (Skarsgård) has left
the Catholic Church to pursue a career in archaeology. When
he is asked to visit a dig in Kenya, were it is claimed they
have uncovered a church that dates back to 500 AD hundreds of
years before Christianity reached that part of Africa, he discovers
that the church was not built to praise God but to contain evil.
Most of you who have
watched The Exorcist will have always wondered why Father Merrin
is walking out of the desert at the beginning of the movie.
Now we have a prequel but does this film finally answer that
question? No.
In what must be the
biggest wasted opportunity in sequel history, Exorcist: The
Beginning does nothing to answer any of the questions that have
plagued the franchise since it first spat itself onto the screen
in 1973. As the movie progresses you think this might actually
be setting the scene for the first one but you would be sadly
mistaken. While we do find out why Father Merrin became involved
in exorcisms and we see his introduction to the demon that would
haunt him later in life, the film simply doesn’t answer
the questions that have plagued fans for years.
As well as these
inconsistencies, the movie is just, for want of a better word,
awful. The plot is initially intriguing. It revolves around
the discovery of an ancient church in Africa that dates back
to 500 AD, hundreds of years before Christianity came to the
region, which holds a dark secret. It is actually the place
where Lucifer fell when God cast him out of heaven. On its discovery,
the Vatican built a church over the site to contain the evil
that resided there. This is an interesting premise and a good
way of introducing Merrin to the evil presence that would blight
his life but the filmmakers don’t take advantage of it.
Instead they deliver
a clichéd filled script that is basically is a “guess
who is possessed?” story. Forgoing an chance of see more
backstory or answering questions as to why the place was so
evil you just end up waiting to see who becomes the foul-mouthed,
cut faced possessed creature that loves to talk about sex. This
might have been shocking in 1973 but demonic possession needs
to be something more terrifying than just someone who swears
a lot.
A decent cast can’t
even save this from the depths of cinematic hell. Stellan Skarsgård
is a good actor but even he can’t do anything with the
appalling line she has been give but he does well with the exorcist
ritual verse during the finally. Izabella Scorupco, as Sarah,
deserves a chance, as she is a talented actress that seems to
be plagued by the curse of the Bond Girl after appearing in
Goldeneye. James D’Arcy’s Father Francis is criminally
underdeveloped and the rest of the cast don’t really get
a look in.
Exorcist: The Beginning
was a trouble movie from the start. This is in fact the second
version of the film after the studio for rejected the first
one by director Paul Schrader for not been scary enough. The
problem is that Renny Harlin’s attempt isn’t scary
either and just lives on the laurels of the original, not injecting
anything new into the franchise. This is a movie that didn’t
need to be made and another example of how Hollywood has lost
all invention and originally, if it needs to continue to dig
up its past.
You’d need
to be possessed to like this movie.
Star Rating = *
PICTURE & SOUND
Presented in Widescreen
2.35:1 Anamorphic with Dolby Digital 5.1 soundtrack, the transfer
is extremely good. The picture quality is sharp throughout,
even during the very dark scenes with the church. The sound
quality is also good, especially during the climatic confrontation.
BONUS FEATURES
Behind the Scenes
Featurette (8.08 mins)
Director Renny Harlin,
producer James G. Robinson and stars Stellan Skarsgård,
Izabella Scorupco and James D'Arcy talk about making a prequel
to one of the most famous horror movies of all time. The cast
and crew explain the story and the characters and take us behind
the scenes of the production.
Theatrical Trailer
(1.05 mins)
Watch the teaser
trailer for the movie
Feature Commentary
with director Renny Harlin
The man at the helm
of this horror disaster tries to explain the motivations behind
actually making the film. He talks about responsibility to the
story and the character of Father Merrin, highlighting what
is was like directing the prequel to a legendary film in the
horror genre. He also talks about creating a backstory for Merrin
and the demon that he encounters, including facts about the
black idol. This is an informative and quite chatty commentary
track but he doesn’t really take responsibility for how
rubbish the film actually is.
OVERALL
A short featurette
and trailer do not make a good DVD release. The only saving
grace is a decent commentary from the director, but even he
doesn’t take responsibility for how awful the film is.
Buy it only if the power of purchasing compels you.