In
Your Hands tells the story of Anna, recently ordained a priest,
who volunteers for the position of prison chaplain at an all-female
prison. Anna and her husband, we soon learn, have been trying
for a baby for many years when she is asked by one of the prisoners
who seems lost, but hardly talks to her, that she is expecting.
When it turns out that the prediction, or guess, was true, Anna
becomes fascinated with the girl, Kate, hearing rumours that
circulate in the prison about her power to heal others. The
lives of the two women become intertwined in ways that neither
they (in the critical cliché) but more importantly the
viewer could not predict.
In your hands is
the tenth and latest film to be issued with the ‘Dogme’
certificate, joining a select group of films that includes most
famously Lars von Trier’s ‘The Idiots’ and
Thomas Vinterberg’s ‘Festen.’ Both of these
were bad boy films, social satires where shame was forced on
the spectator; the documentary style hooked us even while we
knew we were going to swallow something unpleasant sooner or
later. This is all quite different from Olsen’s manner,
who is more conventionally interested in her subjects, in a
way that you imagine von Trier and Vinterberg might consider
a bit wussy. It’s hard to imagine that many even among
the critics would have noticed that this was a Dogme film, if
it hadn’t been announced to us.
Olsen is genuinely
interested in her characters; everybody in prison has a story,
we discover, according to the liberal way of looking at things,
but not all of them turn out to be gratifying to the main character
as she unveils them. The film centres around her confrontation
with a force that lies beyond her, in Kate’s miraculous
gift of healing: something from beyond the world of conventional
faith, embodied in a woman who turns out to be beyond the female
priest’s powers of forgiveness. The story plays with its
own sincerity in the account of healing, using it as an agnostic
means to test all the characters of the film.
The performances in this film hold it together, more than the
narrative or even the themes, without sliding into the twin
perils of the Dogme method – melodrama and feel-bad manipulation
of the spectator.
Extras
The extras are few
but choice. The longest feature is an interview with Annette
Olsen at the Curzon Soho at the time of the film’s release
in this country, responding t questions from a critic and from
the audience. She talks widely and intriguingly on the research
she and others, including her husband, did for the film (it
was shot in a real prison). as well as the amount of improvisation
that was involved while filming. Unusually Olsen gave her actors
not the scripts but the parts to think about (though this recalls
Mike Leigh’s practice), before revealing that it was a
film about life in a prison. Her second interview goes through
similar material, without being repetitious. The three principal
female actors in the film are also presented, and it was only
watching the actress who played Kate at this point that I realised
how unnaturally still she had been for most of the film.
There are several
sequences of shooting and off camera chatting in the ‘Behind
the Scenes’ extras, including points where the actors
rewrite their own dialogue.
All in all a satisfactory
transfer to DVD; there were no problems with the subtitles which,
without speaking Danish, seemed to be saying the right things
when people were speaking and didn’t start up or trail
on when they weren’t.