George Bataille’s unfinished novel makes it to the screen
courtesy of director Christophe Honoré. This is very
much the director’s own take on a novel that was already
idiosyncratic enough in its combination of incest, social irony
and ultimate nihilism. Seventeen-year-old Pierre comes home
from school in France to join his parents in the Canary islands.
When his father dies, Hélène reveals her own indifference
to the event to her traumatized, God-obssessed son. Soon, she
takes his sexual ( not emotional ) life in hand by introducing
him to some very kinky female friends, leading into ever more
dangerous games. This has to end in tragedy because the director
takes his film very seriously, with cringe-worthy zooms, and
in fact, it does.
The tension of the
plot exists only in the ‘will they, won’t they’
question. The film seems to want it both ways with Huppert’s
character, portraying her as an outsider whose strength we admire,
while she is clearly the manipulative motor of the plot after
the death of her husband, bent on making her son more like herself,
only to abandon him to his own devices once more when she takes
up the racket. Where is the motivation in all this, you might
wonder. Only in a French film would you expect to hear dialogue
such as Huppert’s: ‘In an ideal world this friendship
would unite us. But this is not an ideal world.’ More
noir than that, ‘I want you to love me for the shame I
inspire in you.’ Among the other adaptations made from
the novel, her son arrives home already a victim of a religious
complex, which is bound up with his admiration for his mother,
making his pass-over normality as we know it into mental instability
something that happens before the film begins, rather than during
it. Garrel, with his Carravaggio-esque looks, would seem to
be ideal casting for the part, yet for much of the time he appears
to have been imitating the effectless style of the director
and Huppert herself. As a result, Pierre is more of a portrait
with a blank in the centre than an enigma whose growing pains
we follow.
Is the film even
sexy? Public, sado-masochistic, gay and lesbian varieties all
show up, but whether it amounts to sexiness is very much a question
of taste I suppose. Certainly the air of transgression which
the director wants to evoke can hardly work when the main characters
are already so far out of the loop as social beings. The only
challenging scenes were, for me, the final ones, where a Bertollucian
sense of scandal does take a hold, suggesting a film that (conceivably)
might have been.
Recently Catherine
Breillat’s Anatomie de l’enfer seemed to be the
Wild Raspberries so to speak of the cinematic season for the
portentuousness with which it manhandled the themes of sex and
anguish. Ma Mère does not fare better, shedding ultimately
little light on the important subjects of a young man’s
growing pains, despotic parents and familial abuse. So boos
for Honoré’s self-conscious, would-be arthouse
film, faint cheers for Isabelle Huppert’s Zen-like ability
to rise above it all by sheer inimitable talent, and good luck
to the talented Loius Garrel, more famously known as the incestuous
brother in Bertolluci’s The Dreamers. Apart from the translation
there are no extra features on this DVD. The cinema release
in Britain has been timed to coincide with its issue on DVD.