Recovered
Classic: Bird
Jazz
musicians and blues singers make fascinating subjects for
biopics because many of them led such tumultuous lives.
Some of the all-time greats were famously plagued by drug
addiction and alcoholism, none more so than legendary saxophonist
Charlie “Bird” Parker.
So it was no surprise when his incredible story was put
on celluloid in 1988. What might have raised a few eyebrows
was the fact that Clint Eastwood was behind the camera.
Eastwood’s direction, however, proved mighty impressive,
wisely choosing to put the music centre stage and giving
Forest Whitaker the perfect platform from which to produce
a towering central performance. But at over two-and-a-half
hours long, the film does open itself up to a number of
minor quibbles.
We’ll come to those later, because any movie which
wins an Oscar (for Best Sound), earns its director a Golden
Globe and its star a Best Actor gong at Cannes has obvious
merits which deserve attention. The keys to Bird’s
success as a movie lie in Whitaker’s career best tour-de-force
and Eastwood’s free-form direction, which allows the
story to flit backwards and forwards and follow a non-linear
structure, as if mirroring the improvisational genius for
which Parker became so famous.
In terms of his formative years, Eastwood almost does away
with Parker’s youth and concentrates mainly on the
events that shaped his life from his late teens onwards.
The reason for this is that the director clearly wants to
focus on major turning points, such as his drug dependency,
alcoholism, the death of his daughter, his rise to fame,
his relationship with devoted wife Chan Parker (Diane Verona)
and his friendship with fellow bebop originator Dizzy Gillespie.
Then there’s the music. Second in the billing only
to Whitaker himself, it’s worth pointing out that
the saxophone heard on the soundtrack is actually being
played by the real-life Bird. Eastwood and music co-ordinator
Lennie Niehaus began with actual recordings (some of them
from Chan Parker’s private collection), isolated the
Parker tracks and recombined them with contemporary musicians
to create a new stereophonic soundtrack. It’s this
sort of attention to detail which makes such a huge difference.
But while the music is ever-present, there’s no getting
away from Parker’s drug and alcohol addiction. He
was a warm and gentle man, someone who only Chan really
understood, and this is portrayed superbly by both Whitaker
and Verona, with the latter perhaps being too much of a
peripheral figure. So too is Gillespie (Sam Wright), a man
who formed such a strong relationship with Parker and who
tellingly describes himself as a reformer and Bird as a
martyr. “People always remember martyrs longer,”
he adds.
Admittedly, Eastwood had a lot to cram in, but he chooses
to spend time lingering on the “important” events
(his attempted suicide, his spell in an institution), in
an effort to give them more impact, rather than linger on
other episodes in Parker’s life, such as his prestigious
recording career, which is merely hinted at.
But it was Parker’s personal notoriety (he was also
a womaniser and frequently lost his temper), rather than
his God-like artistry, which always made the headlines,
so the word according to Bird often falls by the wayside.
Eastwood’s ambitious movie, however, is remarkably
faithful to many true-life events, such as an early jam
session when a young Bird was ushered off stage during a
jam session when an unimpressed drummer hurled a cymbal
at him. A tour of the Deep South also features prominently,
which saw white trumpeter Red Rodney passed off as an albino
because integrated bands were forbidden.
Which just leaves the great man’s death, which is
poignantly portrayed. As a musician, he carried on playing
as long as he could, but his addiction had reduced him to
a physical wreck and his body could take it no longer. He
collapsed one evening at the home of a jazz loving baroness.
The coroner who attended on the night estimated his age
at 65. Parker was 34.
David
Lichtneker
Site
Contents Copyright© The Z Review, unless used with permission.This
site has no intention to infringe on the rights of the film owners of Bird and
intellectual copyright holders of the movies mentioned herein & hold copyright
over the movie, characters, merchandise & storyline.