We have
all heard the story of the chicken who claimed the sky was
falling. We all know it was a hoax and this little gem of
a tale is to teach kids not to lie or exaggerate. But what
if, the chicken did in fact tell the truth?
In Chicken
Little, the new computer-animated film from Disney, a young
nerdy Chicken Little (voiced by Zach Braff) rings the town
bell when a piece of the sky bonks him on the head. The
town goes into extreme panic and when nothing happens Chicken
Little is pronounced a fraud much to the disappointment
of his dad (Garry Marshall).
It takes
time for the timid young chicken to gain back the respect
and help his relationship with his dad. But just as everything
begins to clear up, Chicken Little is once again faced with
another piece of the sky and this time it’s linked
to an alien invasion that could wipe out everyone in town.
What is a chicken to do?
Disney’s
Chicken Little is the first computer-animated film the studio
has produced since they split with giant Pixar. Disney decided
to create their own computer-animated division and pick
up directly where Pixar left off. (They are even in the
process of producing sequels to Pixar films without Pixar’s
input) Chicken Little is the first of that experiment. Can
a lone little chicken save Disney’s struggling animation
division?
Don’t
forget that this isn’t the first time that Disney
has released a computer animated film without Pixar, 2000’s
“Dinosaur” was a huge hit and gobbled up a lot
of the business that year.
As a
film, Chicken Little felt to me like it was a melting pot
of every “alien invasion film” and “outer
space cartoon” I have seen in recent memory. There
are the obvious scenes playing homage to “War of the
Worlds”, “Close Encounters” and “E.T.”
but I found myself more comparing the film as a whole to
other animated films like “Jimmy Neutron” and
“Jetsons: The Movie”. The more direct comparisons
I found to those films, the more I got annoyed.
Chicken
Little isn’t anything that special and it probably
belongs in the second-tier of computer-animated films like
“Madagascar”, “Shrek 2”, “Bug’s
Life” and “Robots” but fear not it isn’t
as atrocious as “Valiant” which is probably
still the worst computer-animated film to date.
I really
liked the character designs and the animation but felt that
the story was just so basic and not involving. Some of the
kids, we watched the film with, were even a little bored
which isn’t good in a film that lasts barely 70+ minutes.
When
you get a theatre full of kids I am sure they will like
the film but I am not sure that adults are going to have
as much fun as they did with “The Incredibles”,
“Finding Nemo” and “Shrek”.
Chicken
Little is proof that you need strong writing not just strong
animation. Which uncannily is exactly the same thing that
was wrong with 2000’s “Dinosaur”.
A strange
mistake for Disney: an animated film unlikely to appeal
to anyone--too stupid for adults, too convoluted for small
children, and full of references that'll be lost on anyone
in between. At least it's lively and colourful, so easily
distracted viewers will be fine.
A year
after his notorious "the sky is falling" incident,
Chicken Little (voiced by Braff) is still humiliated, especially
since his father (Marshall) wouldn't believe him. His friends
are the class outcasts--ugly duckling Abby (Cusack), camp
fatty Runt (Zahn), gurgling Fish Out of Water. Then just
as he finally proves himself, the sky starts falling again.
Maybe Dad will finally believe him when an all-out alien
invasion begins.
Yes,
the story lurches suddenly from school comedy to War of
the Worlds mayhem. Characters have sudden changes of heart
for no apparent reason, or do horrible things only to be
instantly forgiven in a moment of wrenching sentimentality.
And they aren't defined beyond obvious physical issues until
the plot needs something from them, and even then it's completely
random.
In other
words, it's impossible to get a handle on these characters,
especially without distinctive voice work. This isn't the
actors' fault; the script gives them nothing to work from,
merely dashing to the first cheap gag or another obscure
(to anyone under 20) movie or music reference. O'Hara and
Willard are hilarious--and irrelevant--as an alien married
couple. And Cusack manages to inject some spark into her
role, although Abby is so grotesque that we never warm to
her (I doubt her figures will sell out at the Disney Store).
The
design is intriguingly outrageous, packed with quirky shapes
and lots of movie references. But it's technically extremely
sub-par. It looks like a draft version, before the feathers
and liquids and other surfaces were properly rendered. In
other words: the entire film looks and feels like an extended
episode of a TV cartoon. There are moments of sharp wit
and visual genius that keep us watching, but it never really
takes off. And it's extremely forgettable.