Those
lonely commuter train rides really can get to us. The faceless
strangers we are crunched together with as we are shuttled
around until we reach our next stop. A sigh of relief as
we can breathe for a minute then its back into the mosh
pit we call a bus or train. Ah, thank god, only six more
stops to go. Is this you?
Well
I can not imagine any of those faceless strangers look like
Clive Owen or Jennifer Aniston. If they did I bet public
transit would be up 80%. What, not a 100%? Well, not all
of us like Owen or Aniston.
In the
new film, Derailed, two faceless commuter drones (Owen and
Aniston) find each other and decide to act on their mutual
attraction. Who cares if they’re married, they’re
attractive and well this is a movie. Oh there are the “well
gosh, I don’t know, what will my husband/wife think?”
and the “but kissing you felt so good” scenes
and all the deafeningly thick romantic mood tension. Really
is it all that romantic other than watching two attractive
people smooch? Didn’t think so.
Like
all “forbidden affairs” everything goes inevitably
bad. This time the couple’s love tryst is invaded
by a mean guy (Vincent Cassel) who seems to be cardboard
cut-out of the most boring villain ever. This oh-so mean
guy beats Owen to a pulp, rapes Aniston and well leaves
them alive so he can bug them later.
And
bugging them he does, like that gnat you can never catch.
Owen in his best “aw shucks” performance lets
this guy continue to make him feel less and less like a
man. I never bought it.
Then
in comes the “clichéd” copy boy (RZA)
who works with Owen, did time in the “big house”
and has to help Owen out.
There
are so many clichés, dumb coincidences and goofy
character reactions in this film that not for one moment
did I believe Clive Owen in this flick. I never bought him
as a wimp. I love Owen as an actor but here he is just so
overly miscast.
I really
think that Owen’s performance and character should
have been more like Harrison Ford in Roman Polanski’s
“Frantic”. The guy isn’t a moron and does
all he can to fight back even if he is an every-day joe.
Just because your every-day doesn’t mean you won’t
fight. Owen is a wet noodle compared to Ford in “Frantic”.
Aniston
has her moments but for the most part this is her attempt
at breaking the mold role. She was a lot better in the “Good
Girl” but here she finds a way to carry on some of
what she built in that film. One of these days the demon
sitting on her shoulder, or do I mean her agent, will stop
calling her Rachel.
I really
do think that this film could have been a lot more powerful
and more interesting if a new director was attached. It
needed a David Fincher, Alfred Hitchcock or even something
sexier from say an Adrian Lyne. The film could have also
used some smarter writing.
I really
like Clive Owen and for the most part I think Jennifer Aniston
could do drama but this isn’t a good vehicle for either
party. Aniston needs to get grittier, grimier and less inhibited
to finally shrug off her nice girl image. Just please Jennifer
don’t call Jane Campion. She nearly offed Nicole Kidman
in “Portrait of a Lady” and sacrificed Meg Ryan
to Satan with “In the Cut”. Poor Meg may never
recover.
“Derailed”
is an ok and rudimentary thriller but since I guessed a
lot of the film’s impact 20 minutes in I was hoping
it would at least deliver in performance or visually. It
didn’t on either.
Swedish
director Hafstrom (Evil) gives a striking visual sheen to
this simplistic thriller, essentially a variation on Fatal
Attraction, with exactly the same themes.
Charles
(Owen) is an overworked Chicago ad-man with a wife (George)
and daughter (Timlin) in the suburbs. Much of his attention
has gone toward earning money to pay for the daughter's
kidney transplant, straining his marriage as a result. So
he's vulnerable when he meets the flirty Lucinda (Aniston)
on a commuter train. But just as they begin a tentative
affair, they're assaulted by the French thug Laroche (Cassel),
who turns into a menacing extortionist and threatens to
destroy Charles' entire life.
The
plot is both preposterous and predictable--alert viewers
will see the twists coming. So it's the central issues that
keep us gripped, asking as things get increasingly tense,
"What would I do here?" The problem is that all
of the characters make such bad decisions that it's difficult
to feel any sympathy at all, no matter how engaging the
performances or how stylishly the film looks.
There's
a nice Hitchcockian vibe running through this wronged-man
story, and Owen plays Charles with a surprisingly energetic
charm, balanced by Aniston's sexy fragility and Cassel's
kinetic viciousness. From the moment they come together,
these three seem locked in a death struggle, with increasingly
threatening situations in which no one's remotely innocent.
It's also nice to see Aniston play a darker, murkier character
than normal (to match her darker, murkier hairdo).
Hafstrom
has some superb jolts up his sleeves, and even gives the
supporting cast character-defining scenes. Esposito is fascinating
in the under-written detective role; RZA is surprisingly
effective as Charles' ex-con coworker; Conti is rarely seen
as Charles' boss; Xzibit is pretty bad as Laroche's sidekick.
Gaping
plot holes are plentiful, but not too glaring, although
Beattie's script cheats by withholding some key information
to make way for one last twist. The strangest thing, though,
is how the filmmakers skip over the potential subtext (race/class
issues) to make what's essentially a shallow, pointless
thriller. Like a one-night stand, it's gripping while it
lasts, but will be hard to remember in the morning.