The
Dinner Game Movie Review:
An
interesting fact about the movie The Dinner Game is that
it is one of the top box office hits of all time in France.
While people here in Canada seem to avoid our own movies
like the plague, except that year when Porky`s came out,
of course, France seems to have had much success. Certainly,
the French film industry is obviously comfortable enough
with itself that it is able to get away with putting out
what is nothing more than a clever sitcom, and the French
people are obviously supportive enough of their cinema to
actually go see this film.
Yes,
this film is fluff, but it is fairly entertaining fluff,
and at only 80 minutes, very tolerable. I`m lucky for that,
because I felt a bit misled by this film. I was under the
uninformed impression that The Dinner Game was going to
be some sort of satire on class relations! Why, you may
ask? Because of the film`s bizarre premise: a bunch of high-class
snobs have a dinner party every week, where the guests invite
'idiots' whose eccentricities are laid bare to the expectant
crowd. The goal, of course, is to bring the best idiot.
So, of course, I thought that the idiots were really just
the lower classes, and that the rich people were making
fun of them. But that is not really the aim of this film.
This is nothing much more than a French version of all those
comedies in which a mis-matched pair get themselves in numerous
bouts of trouble, generally can`t stand each other, and
then suddenly make up at the end just in time for the credits
to roll. But, luckily, this film is nowhere near as, well,
idiotic as the others.
As
the film opens, a young, arrogant rich guy is nervous over
not finding his idiot yet. He is so concerned that he tries
to get a friend to find one for him. This scene also includes
a very intriguing moment in which he even attempts to get
his friend`s own father to be the idiot, once he discovers
his hobby. Luckily, the friend finds an idiot, and the world
champion of idiots, to be exact, a man whose greatest achievement
is being able to construct the world`s great architectural
marvels with matchsticks. He is so passionate about this
hobby that he gets into a very detailed description of the
painstaking construction to the man`s friend. This guy will
knock everybody`s socks off, not a doubt!!
But
things do not go as planned. The young man suddenly puts
out his back, and his doctor insists that he miss the party.
He can`t do this! He has the world champion with him tonight!
The man does arrive at his house, however, and after a long
conversation, the young man does not care about his bad
back, and prepare themselves to leave. But suddenly he gets
a call on his answering machine from his wife. She is leaving
him because, essentially, he is nothing but an arrogant
swine, which is clear to every viewer, I believe. The rest
of the movie consists of the young man`s attempts to get
his wife back, and the "idiot's" bungling of all these attempts.
Almost every scene takes place on this one set, and feels
almost like a filmed play.
The
humour in this film is basically of both the slapstick and
the idiot variety. This material would work well in any
American comedy, but what`s interesting is that this film
doesn`t go over the top too much. All of the actors are
genuinely believable, and many of the situations take on
a logic of their own. In many cases, the chaos comes from
making one tiny little mistake, from becoming just a little
bit distracted, until everything snowballs into sometimes
embarrassing predicaments. The guest is a complete bundle
of nerves, especially on the telephone, where he makes some
extraordinary blunders, and makes even more while trying
to repair them. I really ought not to give away too much
of the humour, but I can give you a few high point for you
to look out for. There`s the scene in which the guest is
told to phone the young man`s doctor, but, unknowingly,
accidently calls the young man`s mistress, only to tell
her his wife has just left him. There`s the moment when
the young man attempts to explain to the guest the name
of his wife`s former lover. And, later on, when the guest`s
friend, a tax inspector, enters the house, while the young
man despreately attempts to hide all of his valuables. This
sequence ends surprisingly, for the taxman. And there is
lots, lots more!
I
didn`t laugh out loud too often during this film. The humour
simmers rather than boils, but I never felt the need to
cringe at any of the scenes, and it was generally a pleasant
comedy. I was also happy that The Dinner Game did not wallow
in sap and sentiment, which is a common occurrence in some
of the worst American comedies. In this case, just as the
climax came dangerously close to entering that well-worn
area, the director did not attempt to pad the scene with
teary score music, or false emotion. All he puts in is a
quick lesson in empathy, and he leaves it at that. That
kind act of directorial mercy is almost enough to recommend
this film all by itself, while the restrained yet amusing
antics are enough to completly recommend it.
David
Macdonald
Site
Contents Copyright© The Z Review, unless used with permission.This
site has no intention to infringe on the rights of the film
owners of The Dinner Game and intellectual copyright holders of the
movies mentioned herein & hold copyright over the movie,
characters, merchandise & storyline.