Forces
of Nature Movie Review:
"Forces
of Nature" tells the story of two people brought together
and kept together by a vast array of "natural disasters"
-- fires, hail storms, hurricanes, even an unfortunate bird
flying in the wrong air space at the wrong time. Is it fate?
I view it more as a cinematic necessity, seeing as though
the two people involved probably wouldn't find each other
even remotely attractive under any other circumstance.
The
movie seems to teeter between being a dark comedy and a
bittersweet romantic comedy. It's neither. That's the problem.
The humor isn't sharp, witty or cutting-edge enough to make
the film "dark", and there's no chemistry whatsoever between
the two leads which doesn't bode well for it's attempt at
being a romantic comedy.
The
story centers around Ben Holmes (Affleck), a book jacket
copywriter who is on his way to Savannah, Georgia to marry
the woman of his dreams. Her name is Bridget (Maura Tierney),
and she is beautiful, sensitive, and intelligent -- those
qualities demonstrated early on when she confesses her love
for him while at the same time admitting she's scared about
the future. Despite his seemingly perfect situation, Ben
is constantly bombarded with advice from friends, family
members, and even strangers warning him about the trials
and tribulations of marriage. As if all the advice weren't
enough, when the plane he boards begins it's takeoff, it
suddenly experiences a technical problem and careens off
the runway. Shaken but not badly injured, Ben insists on
getting to Savannah, albeit by some other mode of transportation.
At the airport, he meets a young drifter named Sarah (Bullock)
heading to the same destination, and they decide to travel
together.
The
rest of the movie cuts back and forth, between Ben and Sarah
trying to get where they need to go, and Bridget and her
parents (Blythe Danner and Ronny Cox), as they grow increasingly
anxious about whether the groom will make it on time. This
is all familiar territory, and the film doesn't throw us
any curves - it's pretty routine stuff. (For example, when
Sarah and Ben masquerade as a condominium-hunting married
couple to board a bus for Miami and Sarah introduces him
as a doctor, you know it's only a matter of time until one
of the passengers needs medical attention and it's up to
the "doctor" to save the day.)
The
question the movie seems to be asking isn't whether marriage
is "worth it", but whether the Ben Affleck character has
truly lived life to the fullest. This unusual young woman
has seemingly opened his eyes to a whole new world and a
whole new way of looking at things, and now Ben must decide
if the life path he is on is the one he should be on. I
have a couple of problems with this scenario. The first
is an issue of credibility. The character of Sarah has supposedly
tasted some of the worst life has to offer. Sure, she's
made wrong turns along the way, but hasn't exactly been
dealt a decent hand. As played by Bullock, though, Sarah
doesn't come across as hard-edged as someone like that would.
At times, she's more like a goofy teenager. Also, the "adventures"
that free Ben from his routine life really aren't that outlandish.
(In one scene, they bum around a K-Mart department store,
communicate to each other on cute little pink and purple
walkie-talkies their views on marriage and it's similarities
to shopping. After two minutes of this, I wouldn't be questioning
my vows, I'd be running for that altar.)
But
perhaps the biggest distraction is the lack of chemistry
between Bullock and Affleck. The scenes where the two of
them appear to be falling for each other have a laborious
feel to them. How laborious? Consider the scene where they
fight in their hotel room. It is curiously arranged in the
plot so that Bullock takes her wet clothes off as the two
of them argue. (In the previous scene, they jumped into
the pool to avoid being "caught" by one of Ben's friends.)
They continue arguing until Bullock, with her clothes off,
perches herself atop the bed. Why? Apparently for no other
reason except so Affleck can give in to his "attraction"
and kiss her when the plot needs him to. Scenes like that
clearly show that even the filmmakers themselves don't believe
the chemistry exists.
The
film was directed by Bronwen ("Harriet the Spy") Hughes,
who has an unusual visual style. She likes using numerous
lighting and editing techniques, in addition to placing
the camera at many different angles. I get the feeling that
with good material to work with, she could probably put
together a decent black comedy. And the actors are all likable
and have shined in much better films. The central problem
here is the material itself. It really says something about
a movie plot when fires and hurricanes and lightning and
thunder and hail can all mysteriously conspire to keep two
people together and the part of the story that lacks credibility
is the romance itself. Someone should have let Mother Nature
in on the secret.
Copyright
2001
Michael Brendan McLarney
Site
Contents Copyright© The Z Review, unless used with permission.This
site has no intention to infringe on the rights of the film
owners of Forces of Nature and intellectual copyright holders of the
movies mentioned herein & hold copyright over the movie,
characters, merchandise & storyline.