|
|
Four
Eyes Movie Review:
Synopsis:
Paul Hunt is a trainee salesman who is seriously down on
his luck. Not only has he just been liberated of £1000
after a mugging in his local park, but his nightmarish boss
“Big Al” forces him to wear glasses as they
make him “…look 15% more intelligent”.
He has also been ‘gifted’ with a horrendously
ugly company car, and has his pregnant girlfriend constantly
haranguing him about a new home for the soon - to - be expanding
family.
This is a low – budget, digital feature which focuses
strongly upon dialogue and exchanges between characters.
The story begins with the central character, Paul, having
just been mugged, laying face down in the grass. He spends
the rest of the movie being kicked down by people.
Paul’s life is utterly crap. The mugging is just one
of a list of unfortunate raindrops that plop from the constant
cloud above his head. But he does himself no favours, and
his negative outlook stains everything he tries to achieve.
He’s lazy, selfish and useless. But he never really
gets a chance to be anything else as someone is always on
his case.
You never really empathise with Paul, though.
Yes, his girlfriend is a nagging pain, (but she has a point,
if he’s not paying the bills!), his twin brother is
a gambling addict, and his boss at the double glazing firm,
Big Al, is the Glaswegian representative for Satan, but
at least he’s quite amusing to watch on screen.
This is a problem. The best actor plays big Al’s character,
and even he’s a bit shaky at times. Paul, and the
rest of the cast unfortunately, are of the non - professional
variety, most of them probably chosen because they would
be more authentic (as well as a fair bit cheaper). But instead
of authentic, we get amateur, due to an apparent weakness
in direction.
There is limited evidence of control over some aspects of
the film’s dialogue, but improv doesn’t really
come naturally to most of the actors, especially Paul, who
has a smirk on his face even when mugged, thumped and losing
everything on the g – g’s.
This comes across as the smirk of someone who is not really
in character, and therefore not believable. It’s hard
to take the plot seriously when it is sometimes quite obvious
that the cast have been given perhaps a wisp of dialogue
and told to improvise the rest. This results in scenes where
the actors repeat a line several times, and are obviously
trying to think of how to flesh it out as it is being said,
which, when the banter is the main selling point, isn’t
a great situation.
The digital, handheld method of filming actually does the
movie no harm - it’s reasonably well executed, and
the editing isn’t too bad, it’s just that the
bare bones don’t carry for 66 minutes.
As a premise, Four Eyes could have been really amusing,
but it can’t decide whether it’s meant to be
funny or touching – as a result it is neither.
Terresa Gaffney
Site
Contents Copyright© The Z Review, unless used with permission.This
site has no intention to infringe on the rights of the film
owners of Four Eyes and intellectual copyright holders of the
movies mentioned herein & hold copyright over the movie,
characters, merchandise & storyline.
|
|
Four Eyes
Info:
|
Reviewed
at the Edinburgh International Film Festival 2003
Four
Eyes (UK 2003)
Director:
Duncan Finnigan
Cast:
Gordon Grant, John Smith, Wilma Smith, Duncan Finnigan,
Mark O’ Hare.
Running
Time: 1 Hour 14 Minutes
Showing
along with short film: Hyper
Reviewed
by:
Terresa Gaffney
|
|