The
Grapes of Wrath Movie Review:
The
director John Ford is best known for his Westerns – films
such as The Searchers, The Man who Shot Liberty Valance,
and My Darling Clementine – but he has also directed other
films, which have garnered him four directing Oscars. The
Grapes of Wrath, from 1940, is one of these films, starring
Henry Fonda.
The
film, based on John Steinbeck`s novel, takes place in the
middle of the Great Depression, and the direction successfully
captures the bleakness and the despair that many people
and families went through, without a livelihood, or, sometimes,
enough food. Ford dispels of melodramatic score music, love
stories, or generically "exciting" scenes, and just gives
us the misery. The film begins when Fonda returns home after
four years in jail for manslaughter. He expects to return
to work at the family farm, but instead finds a run-down
house with nobody in it, and he almost wonders if everybody
is dead. But, in truth, the family has been, like many others,
kicked off their land, because they can no longer afford
to pay the rent, due to years of bad returns from crops.
After Fonda returns to his family, they begin on a long,
painful trip to California, with hopes of finding work.
Along the way, however, hardships, deceit, death, and violence
affect them.
As
a history lesson, this film is quite informative. The passions
of people who despreatly need money and food for themselves
is graphically portrayed, most effectively in an early flashback
scene when a neighbour tells of the destruction of his farm,
by company bulldozers. He naturally and vainly attempts
to protect, one last time, his belongings, and is shocked
to discover that one of the bulldozer riders is a son of
another farmer. Like the man who attempts to defend his
farm, the bulldozer rider also defends his own livelihood
and family by taking this job, even if it happens to negatively
affect a neighbour. We also learn of the people who easily
take advantage of naive, poor families, by promising them
hopes of high-paying work, only to give out very limited
work, with horrible pay.
Fonda
is the star of this film, but he is far from its sole focus.
There is a large cast of fairly unknown (to me) actors,
and each one has one`s own quirks and eccentricities. Perhaps
they are a bit too quirky, actually. Much of the quirkiness
exists not so much by the character`s actions, but by the
way they speak. Every person in this film speaks in a deliberately
colloquial manner, with fractured syntax and the like. The
language is almost too perfect in its imperfection. But
the movie should not be faulted too much for this, since
we did not live when this film was made, when such dialogue
was Hollywood`s newfound attempt to depict the common man.
The story does not, ultimately, mock or deride the everyday
folk, but praises their resourcefulness, and their strength
of survival. In a sense, this is a socialist film, with
its harsh critique of greedy, capitalist buisnessmen, and
the positive outlook on government social relief. And its
view of religion is also facinating in the character of
Casey, a preacher who no longer has the heart to preach,
now that he understands that the world is not as black-and-white
as the Bible would have him believe. He discovers that there
is more than even he thinks there is. Overall, this is a
great film, which proves that even Hollywood films from
bygone days can also transcend the fashionable and hip,
and become art.
David
Macdonald
Site
Contents Copyright© The Z Review, unless used with permission.This
site has no intention to infringe on the rights of the film
owners of The Grapes of Wrath and intellectual copyright holders of the
movies mentioned herein & hold copyright over the movie,
characters, merchandise & storyline.