Hidalgo
Movie Review:
1890,
Frank Hopkins (Mortensen) and his horse Hidalgo were legendary
long distance racers winning competitions all over the US.
His reputation was spreading to the point that it gained
the attention of Sheikh Riyadh (Sharif). Every year his
family run a 3000-mile race called the Ocean of Fire across
some of the most inhospitable desert the Middle East has
to offer. Frank accepts the challenges but nobody expects
that an inferior mustang could ever beat a field full of
thoroughbred Arabian horses.
Viggo
Mortensen takes another step towards becoming the silver
screen’s most bankable hero, the same way as Harrison
for did after starring in a successful film trilogy.
Based
on the allegedly true story of life of Frank Hopkins, this
is a big budget action that isn’t like your usual
high concept fair. The movie combines blistering action,
exhilarating racing with slow character development and
a lot of subtitles as the characters speak in their native
languages. This is an unusual approach for a potential blockbuster,
as it is well known that excessively subtitled films find
it difficult to reach an audience in English speaking countries,
especially the US.
The
story of Frank Hopkins and his horse Hidalgo is still interesting
however as it is a tale of extreme endurance made all the
more watchable by some great performances. Omar Sharif brings
a touch of class to the proceeding as the honourable Sheikh
Riyadh. The actor just exudes dignity and commands respect
every time he graces the screen. It’s a shame that
we don’t see him more often. The beautiful Zuleikha
Robinson makes her big screen splash as Jazira. This should
start to get the British actress noticed in Hollywood. Louise
Lombard is also good as Lady Ann Davenport, the woman with
a lot to gain if her horse wins the race.
This
is Viggo Mortensen’s showpiece however. Not shackled
by a fellowship, Mortensen is becoming an extremely watchable
actor and the hero for new millennium. He is emerging as
a lead actor that can command the screen and bring iconic
idols to life.
Hidalgo
is a good movie that is bogged down by been slightly too
long and by having large gaps between the action. Director
Joe Johnston is known for his big budget spectaculars like
The Rocketeer, Honey I Shrunk the Kids and Jurassic Park
but his shows that his can handle character development
as well as rip-roaring action. Capturing the extremes of
the Arabian Desert brilliantly and always doing enough to
entertain, this is a movie that is well worth a flutter.
Star
Rating = * * *
Jamie
Kelwick
Hidalgo
brings to life the story of Frank T. Hopkins, a pony express
rider who claims, among other things, to have won nearly
every long distance horseback race that existed at the time.
While a little research shows that the "true"
portion of its claim to be based on a true story is anything
but, Hidalgo's real problems stem from factors far more
significant than whether or not Hopkins actually lived up
to all of his claims. Hidalgo is a sprawling, wide-screen,
western epic that's not only overly ambitious but also suffers
from a touch of multiple personality disorder.
As the
film opens, we learn that Hopkins (Viggo Mortensen) is now
a performer in Buffalo Bill Cody's Wild West Show. Having
once been a dispatch rider for the U.S. Cavalry, he now
spends his days performing bareback riding tricks and tipping
the bottle. With the haunting images of the massacre of
innocent Native Americans at Wounded Knee Creek still fresh
in his head, Hopkins goes through the motions of life with
very little motivation and even less sense of purpose. So,
it's not a surprise when he accepts the invitation from
a wealthy sheik (Omar Sharif) to participate in the grueling
3,000-mile "Ocean of Fire" race, on horseback,
across the Arabian Peninsula.
The
"Ocean of Fire" has been run in Saudi Arabia for
thousands of years as a means to test the noblest of purebred
Arabian stallions. But Hopkins' horse, called Hidalgo, is
a lowly mustang, a mixed breed, regarded as impure and extremely
inferior. Naturally, the local Arabs deride Hopkins' participation
in the dignified race, seeing it as a violation of the event's
distinction. Setting up the film's main theme, we learn
that Hopkins himself is also of mixed descent, the progeny
of a white man and a Native American. While the film's intentions
of cleverly juxtaposing these similarities of the man to
his horse are indeed honorable, the message might have succeeded
if managed with a more subtle hand. African slaves in ankle
chains are frequently paraded across the screen, reminding
us of the persecution of those considered different or impure.
The Arabs themselves often refer to Hopkins as the infidel,
hammering us with the reminder that he is an outcast, sullying
the purity of their land. In filmmaking, subtlety is a virtue
that when violated, comes across as hokey or amateurish.
There's nothing subtle about Hidalgo.
At first
glance, Hidalgo appears to be an exciting action/adventure
movie. And as that, it succeeds. It features some great
sword-fighting sequences, beautiful vistas, and a classic
James Newton Howard score. Director Joe Johnston is successful
at making the audience feel the excruciating heat, starvation
and thirst suffered by Hopkins and Hidalgo. But after watching
the movie, I realized the filmmakers wanted it to be so
much more. The movie's fun and action became muddied in
an ocean of heavy-handed messages. Is Hidalgo, like The
Last Samurai the story of a confused man looking for a chance
at redemption? Is it the Seabiscuit of 2004? Is it another
Arabian Nights tale? Like Dances With Wolves, is it another
difficult look at the extermination of the Native American
people? To its fault, it tries to be all these things. Hidalgo
might have been a better film had it roped-in its ambitions
a bit. Think about it. With the intentions of making a great
film, how do you successfully combine Buffalo Bill Cody,
African slaves, Oklahoma, swords, Arabian sheiks, Annie
Oakley, The Red Sea, the U.S. Cavalry, Muslims, Omar Sharif,
Christians, and little pointy-toed genie shoes? The point
is, you can't.
Hidalgo
sprawls way too far and its ambitions considerably exceed
its grasp. I really wanted the film to allow me to connect
a bit more with Hidalgo, the horse. Clearly screenwriter
John Fusco wanted to glorify horses, and he mostly succeeded;
but at a runtime of nearly 2 1/2 hours, I'm sure executive
decisions had to be made. He must have cut the wrong parts.
I feel as though I just watched Hidalgo I: The Pony Express
Horse, Hidalgo II; the People of the Horse, Hidalgo III:
The Ocean of Fire, and Hidalgo IV: Return of The People
of the Horse, all rolled into one. They might have killed
a franchise before it ever became a franchise.
Frank
Wilkins
He's
back in the saddle again. Viggo Mortensen (Aragorn from
"The Lord of the Rings" trilogy) saddles up a
new horse as he rides into the adventure epic, "Hidalgo".
Mortensen
plays real-life legend Frank Hopkins, a long distance horse
racer and dispatcher who ends up washed up and in Buffalo
Bill's Wild West Show.
Hopkins gets the challenge of a lifetime when a Sheik (Omar
Sharif) sends for him to enter the epic 3,000 mile race
across the Arabian Desert. The
Sheik urges Frank to prove his claim that he is the best
long distance racer in the world. Can Frank and his beloved
horse Hidalgo survive such a
challenge in a far off land? Can they endure the infamous
Ocean of Fire and live to tell the tale? This stubborn cowboy
sure hopes so.
"Hidalgo"
is great escapist entertainment as Frank's adventures in
Arabia are plenty and fun to behold.
Mortensen
is stern and steadfast as the cowboy hero and there is a
lot in common here to his beloved portrayal of Aragorn.
Mortensen maybe a laid back actor but his simpler portrayal
of Frank does show he can be an audience favorite.
It is
nice to see Omar Sharif return to the silver screen and
it was kind of funny seeing the cameo from C. Thomas Howell.
The female leads in the film match Mortensen word for word
but I never found captivating or enthralling. That is kind
of a shame since it would have been nice to see what Mortensen
was like next to a strong female lead character.
Hidalgo's
director Joe Johnston has always been a favorite of mine.
The man has directed such projects as "Honey I Shrunk
the Kids", "The Rocketeer", "Jumanji"
and "October Sky". Johnston has also taken up
the reigns of the "Jurassic Park" franchise from
Steven Spielberg where he directed "Jurassic Park 3"
and is slated to directed "Jurassic 4".
Johnston
has always had a certain style for his films. His unique
use of music and grand adventure scenes have always been
a staple. "Hidalgo" has a
lot of elements that are staples of a Joe Johnston film
and it is amazing how they bring a lot more to the film.
He has always been a great audience
pleaser and Hidalgo is no different.
I liked
a lot of Johnston's panoramic and silhouette shots of Viggo
and horse. I liked how he was able to bring life to the
most lifeless of places.
There are so many of those kinds of scenes in this film.
The
film also reminded me some of those old Sheik love stories
starring Rudolph Valentino and the film adaptations of the
Arabian Knights. It was
almost like one of those films with a Gary Cooper or mellower
Charles Brosnan styled cowboy trapped inside. It was a lot
of fun seeing the genres
mix it up.
My only
problem with the film is that it feels quite long. The film's
story is a simple one spread across a 3,000 mile race. There
really is no depth to
sustain the film's exotic adventure.
This
adventure film won't win any awards or challenge us in anyway
but like the film's central character it is steadfast, true
to itself and a joy to
watch.
(4 out of 5)
So Says the Soothsayer.
Dean Kish
Site
Contents Copyright© The Z Review, unless used with permission.This
site has no intention to infringe on the rights of the film
owners of Hidalgo and intellectual copyright holders of the
movies mentioned herein & hold copyright over the movie,
characters, merchandise & storyline.