House
on Haunted Hill Movie Review:
House
on Haunted Hill is a bad horror film that is poorly written.
Terrible and unthinkable things happened to patients at
the Vannacutt Psychiatric Institute for the criminally insane.
The head of the institution, Dr. Vannacutt, performed human
torture and demonic acts on his patients. Now, decades after
the institution was shuttered, six strangers are invited
to spend the night there. The pitch is if they can survive
the night, each will receive a check for one million dollars.
All they have to do is stay alive and become fearless of
the institution's past experiences and ghosts.
House
on Haunted Hill is a typical dumb horror film. Every moment
is predictable and 75 % of the movie becomes unexplained.
Dick
Beebe wrote House on Haunted Hill. Beebe opens the script
with a very eerie view of the dark institution. Afterwards,
the film falls and just keeps falling. The only character
developed is Steve Price, who is an amusement park creator
that enjoys scaring people. Price isn't even one of the
strangers, he is the host and the man behind forming the
proposal to the strangers. The script is also predictable
with the concepts of characters suddenly riving themselves,
after the audience believes that they are dead. The film
is based off the old horror classic version that starred
Vincent Price. Beebe tries to write an updated version of
the story, but his attempt becomes fragile and eventually
dies.
The
acting in House on Haunted Hill is dreadful. I don't know
why Geoffrey Rush would be involved in a film like this.
He is too talented; my only answer is that he got a hefty
paycheck to take on the role of Steven Price. Rush isn't
that bad in this movie, but his performance is not even
near his usual standards. I have said many times that Taye
Diggs is an established actor that will just get better
and better. Unfortunately Diggs delivers a dull performance
as Eddie, who is the hero of the group of strangers. In
addition to, the rest of the cast isn't at all effective
or efficient.
One
last element I would like to touch on is the special effects
that were used in the film. William Malone directed House
on Haunted on Hill and chose to use special effects to show
the evil of the institution. Even though the effects don't
arise until the film's climax, the choice to use them was
ineffective. Special effects are not scary, and I don't
know why Hollywood filmmakers keep getting excited to use
them in horror films. In my opinion, to make a successful
horror film, one has to approach the story with what I call
the old school method. Using common things like sound, actor's
facial expressions, and mysterious cinematography, will
make a film scarier than by using special effects. A nice
example of the old school method is this year's The Blair
Witch Project. The Blair Witch Project contains no gore,
no monsters, no special effects, and the film is just frightening.
I just wished that horror films would turn away from thriving
on special effects.
I
didn't like House on Haunted Hill and I do not recommend
seeing it. This film might get compared to The Haunting,
which is a movie from last summer that follows some of the
same concepts as House on Haunted Hill. However, The Haunting
is the better of the two films.
Report
Card Grade: D
Joseph
Tucker
Site
Contents Copyright© The Z Review, unless used with permission.This
site has no intention to infringe on the rights of the film
owners of House on Haunted Hill and intellectual copyright holders of the
movies mentioned herein & hold copyright over the movie,
characters, merchandise & storyline.