The
Innocents Movie Review:
Now
here is a horror film, the old-fashioned way. The Innocents,
made in 1961, is based on Henry James' The Turn of the Screw,
and, like the book, it brilliantly depicts the terror brought
upon a governess (played here by Deborah Kerr) by her two
seemingly innocent, mannerly charges. We are shown what
seem to be peculiar, ghostly apparitions, but which might
be a symbolic, supernatural representation of something
only too horrifyingly real, and inseparable from the two
children and their disturbing past.
The
movie begins with the children`s uncle interviewing Kerr
- the uncle bluntly portraying himself as a disinterested
party in this situation. He feels burdened with the care
of the kids after their parent`s death, and his demeanour
and words suggest clearly he`d like nothing better to do
than to toss the kids over to a seemingly nice person so
he could travel around the world doing God knows what. He
suggests his attitude is heartless, but Kerr tries to convince
him (and herself, perhaps) this is not.
Another
component in the interview is the attribute of imagination,
and whether Kerr possesses it. The uncle hopes, as most
of his type might, that Kerr possesses enough of it to successfully
distract and entertain the children from the hardships of
before. This subject seems incidental, but imagination might
be exactly what creates the eventual psychological downfall
of the governess and the children, as noone seems to be
entirely sure of what is happening, or why. Mystery can
only breed imagination, and that imagination can concoct
some serious ideas.
In
a nutshell, the issues which bring about the horror are
this: the previous governess had committed suicide. As well,
the dastardly stable keeper, who was killed in an accident
at the home, was in a relationship with her. The two continued
this relationship even though it was quite clear the stable
keeper was abusive and manipulative. It is also known that
these two people were primary influences on the children,
and it might be concluded that the reason the children act
the way they do is due to their admiration of the adults.
And
then what happens is strange: Kerr`s character starts seeing
people she doesn`t recognize. When she tells the maid of
all these strange apparitions, the horror comes out. These
sightings are of the dead, the ghosts of the two dead lovers.
Kerr`s deepening investigation soon leads her to believe
the children have full knowledge of the ghosts, but are
attempting to fool the grown-ups around them. Numerous scenes
will frustrate you, as you will not be sure whether Kerr
is imagining all of this, and merely assaulting these kids'
poor minds, or whether they really are hiding something.
No
matter what the truth is, the grim, surreal mood is never
broken at all, not even during the Fox Fanfare. Instead,
we get this bizarre and creepy tune, sung by Flora, playing
over a blank screen for two or three minutes, with the Fox
logo silently, eventually, appearing in the background.
The direction is mysterious and atmospheric, and the black
and white is shadowy, stern, and otherworldly, as it should
be. This is one of the few films where the mood stays consistent
throughout, never overboard or too mannered.
Now...those
kids.....they are so damned annoying! They sound like kids
trying way too hard to impress their elders. Flora is always
cheerful and overly imaginative. And the (for me) insufferable
Miles embraces every stereotypical British pomposity in
his seemingly tiny frame. This, I`m afraid, is not a fault
of the film, but an aspect taken right from James, who apparently
didn`t have the vision into actual children`s behaviour.
But while words on a page are one thing, the actual presentation,
where I must actually hear these people talk, makes the
children seem less likely. I will be upfront and say this
is a flaw, yet it doesn`t ruin the story itself, which is
brilliantly constructed.
I
truly got a better grasp of this story the second time around,
after having read the book a couple of years ago. I believe
I somewhat understand the symbolic undercurrents in the
appearances of the ghosts. The symbolism seems, to me, to
represent the quite natural and common phenomenon of the
negative effect of abusive elders upon the next generation.
The ghosts, of course, represent the "ghosts", the unspoken
secrets of the past. It is telling that the maid frequently
bids Kerr to stop digging up "what`s over and done with."
The children conspire with the ghosts, because they don't
want to be released from the behaviour they've been taught,
behaviour which clearly has been negative. And the final
shot is a chilling conclusion to what a less thoughtful
viewer might have expected, or wanted. Yet this ending is
necessary, and gives us the natural aftermath of Kerr`s
attempts to drive the ghosts from the children`s presence.
The
Innocents is filled with many attributes, works on many
different level, and should please those looking for a really
good "classic" to view.
David
Macdonald
Site
Contents Copyright© The Z Review, unless used with permission.This
site has no intention to infringe on the rights of the film
owners of The Innocents and intellectual copyright holders of the
movies mentioned herein & hold copyright over the movie,
characters, merchandise & storyline.