Lilies
of the Field Movie Review:
Here's
a nice film; 1963`s Lilies of the Field, starring the Oscar-winning
Sidney Poitier as a man apparently without a home, who seemingly
just lives his life driving around America, doing odd jobs
just to survive. One day he unwittingly finds himself in
the company of five German nuns in a run-down home in the
middle of the Arizona desert. He is just passing through,
as he puts it, and asks for some water to cool down his
engine. But little does he know that he was sent by God
to do an important task.
At
least, this is what the Mother nun heard from the big guy
himself. As soon as she sees Poitier helping himself with
the well, she whispers "God is Good. He has brought us a
big strong man." It seems that the nuns are hoping someone
will help build them a decent chapel to worship in. Poitier
is taken aback by this stern request, and protests it all
the way. However, he is convinced to at least help fix the
roof of the house. Little does he know that he has committed
himself unconsciously to the greater plan: first, he is
about to leave after his work, but he is convinced to stay
for supper, then he is convinced to stay for the night,
and so on, until he realizes he will not get away from here
until he gets that chapel done. Truthfully, it's not so
much that he can't get away, but, beneath all the bluster
and protest, he clearly has a generous soul, which after
an unknown time of lonesome wandering, will now actually
be put to use. Even if he can't help but to do so.
Later
on, he realizes it's not so much the nuns who need his help,
but an entire community. Normally, the nuns must walk for
miles on a dusty dirt road to their Sunday mass, but with
Poitier`s car, they get him to drive them up. It turns out
the ``church`` is nothing more than a spot behind a diner,
led by a priest who travels in a camping trailer. The priest
himself always wished he had a real church to work in, but
doesn`t expect that to happen any time soon. But this only
creates more reason for Poitier`s character to remain and
build a chapel.
Poitier
is a powerful actor, and even in light-hearted material
like this he exudes tremendous presence. He handles both
the comedic and confrontational scenes with ease. There
are many fine moments in both those categories throughout
the movie, including his first English lesson with the German
nuns. He gets a real kick out of their eagerness to follow
his instructions, and proceeds to have a lot of good-natured
fun with it. Another scene has him getting them to join
in a rousing gospel miles away from their rigid Catholic
hymns. There is also a brilliantly subtle element involving
racial tension, during the scene when the nuns try to persuade
a construction company to hire Poitier`s character part-time
so he would be able to stay for the chapel building. The
foreman, as most Southern whites would do, addresses Poitier
as 'boy', and clearly is suspicious of his credentials,
yet slowly agrees to have him on board. No mention is made
to the boy reference until the end of the conversation,
when Poitier, in telling the foreman that he will be an
extremely reliable employee, addresses him as 'boy'. That
word is the only verbal reference, but the way Poiter says
it revealed the growing confidence of society to address
the reality of even subtle (perhaps even unintentional)
racism in every day life, and to do something about it.
Another
subtle element involves how Poitier truly feels about this
mad task. Throughout the film, he behaves as if this is
a true torture, to have to build this chapel for free, and
to live under the nun`s strict rules, but at the same time,
even he is begining to behave, if not through words, as
if this is a mission of some heavenly kind which he must
accomplish. There is a telling moment when the townspeople
offer him help which Poitier constantly refuses, so much
so as to put up a cardboard sign demanding the curious to
keep their hands off the materials. The observers, led by
the diner owner, subtly get into the job, however, which
for a while dissappoints Poitier greatly, until he realizes
that only his leadership and knowledge of the work will
allow for the entire congregation to finish the job properly.
Obviously, Poitier cares greatly that such a project be
done well. Maybe he is a perfectionist, sure. Or maybe he
believes this a test which must be won... or else it won`t
be just people who are dissappointed, but God as well.
Speaking
of religion, it must be said that the theological content
of this film is not too deep. This isn`t a praise-the-Lord
affair, but a film in where religion is used as part of
the overall warmth of the picture. I don`t think anyone
will feel conversion after viewing, but will possibly feel
good about life as a whole. The concern about religion comes
through when the diner owner says that while he does not
know about the after and therefore doesn`t concern himself
with it, he does good deeds for his fellow man out of insurance,
just in case........ This might sound a bit like the idea
by the original Seventh-Day Adventists that there are true
Christians and false ones: the true ones believed in Jesus,
and fully accepted his grace in his life, while the false
ones merely pretended at it, by doing the deeds but not
putting any faith into them. Apparently, those who go by
insurance will not find themselves in a heavenly place when
they are faced with the Final Judgement. But this is just
religious doctrine, we`re dealing in reality here, and the
message of the film is a good, humanistic one. It`s not
so much that we should do good deeds to get on the good
graces of spiritual institutions, but we should just do
them regardless. By helping others out, we feel good and
make others feel good. You feel good for having done something
useful, and others will have a church where they can practise
their religion instead of standing out in the windy desert.
Christianity has nothing to do with it. Only decency.
David
Macdonald
Site
Contents Copyright© The Z Review, unless used with permission.This
site has no intention to infringe on the rights of the film
owners of Lilies of the Field and intellectual copyright holders of the
movies mentioned herein & hold copyright over the movie,
characters, merchandise & storyline.