The
Manchurian Candidate Movie Review:
I
was talking to my friend not too long ago about how the
films of the past seemed to appear much more controversial
than those of today. While there are a number of films from
the past decade that claim to be controversial (Basic Instinct,
etc), they seem to be so merely because of its sensational
content, such as nudity and sex. Rarely does a movie come
out which is truly provocative. How often do we see a movie
with the same impact as something like A Clockwork Orange,
Midnight Cowboy, The Wild Bunch, or Last Tango in Paris?
The
Manchurian Candidate feels like a case in point to me. The
story is a political one, always with potential for controversy.
And the film was obviously so touchy that the star, Frank
Sinatra, had it pulled from the public for over twenty-five
years, due to a scene which he felt came too close to the
Kennedy assassination (which occurred the very year after
the film`s release) to be acceptable to viewers.
The
story, in any case, is both bizarre and complex. During
the Korean War, a group of soldiers (including Sinatra),
led by Lawrence Harvey as the general have been mysteriously
captured by a bunch of renegade Koreans. The next shot is
after the war, in which Harvey is honoured for having saved
his troops in a daring escape. But something is not quite
right here. Sinatra is having disturbing nightmares involving
his capture. And when Sinatra is asked how he felt about
the general, he suddenly turns robotic, and claims that
Harvey was the kindest, bravest man he has ever met. Sinatra
sounds as if he is under a hypnotic spell....... is this
true? And what really happened in Korea?
There
is another storyline, involving Harvey`s turbulent relationship
with his mother, played by Angela Lansbury in a role miles,
if not countries, removed from Jessica Fletcher in Murder,
She Wrote. She and her new husband, campaigning to be re-elected
as senator, have launched a strong campaign against the
supposed Communist influence in certain sectors of the American
government. Harvey not only dislikes mom`s politics, but
actively loathes her as a human being, and shocks her by
taking a job for a man whom the mother sees as a Communist
of the worst kind. (Harvey snaps back by saying that the
employer is an active Republican)
These
two storylines come together, because it is revealed fairly
quickly that something did happen in Korea. That something
is the hypnosis of Harvey by the Communists, who took advantage
of his cold, detached personality and excellent marksmanship
to make him an unwitting assassin. And there is an even
more shocking revelation linking these two plots, one which
creates all sorts of implications.
There
are some truly wicked scenes. The hypnosis nightmare is
well-staged, as the camera slowly circles around a gathering
of old ladies discussing flowers, with the soldiers as guests,
only to reveal, as the camera returns to the podium, that
in fact, we are in a room filled with Communists, demonstrating
the effectiveness of hypnosis. The soldiers are made to
believe they are at a silly garden show. The scenes involving
Angela Lansbury are pretty bizarre as well, as her political
aspirations are more extreme than we could imagine. While
these scenes are biting, I would hesitate, unlike other
critics, to call this comedy. While this film does contain
elements of satire, and humour, all of the political variety
(I really liked how Lansbury and husband finally decide
on the number of Communists the husband will claim exist
in the Defence Department), the film as a whole is very
unpleasantly chilling, especially for an early 1960`s picture,
especially in the second half of the film, in which two
important people from Harvey`s past resurface. As well,
the hypnosis nightmare is bizarre and surreal, and chillingly
presented, and so is the final sequence, crucial in Sinatra`s
decision to ban the film, in which Harvey goes on one last
mission.
Old
Blue Eyes is alright acting-wise, but certainly not the
main focus of this picture. He is needed in order to begin
the investigation, and to move the plot forward. But Janet
Leigh, unfortunately, is useless. She begins a romance with
him halfway through the picture, and that`s it. I guess
Sinatra needed someone to talk to, so she was created. The
real forces in this picture are Laurance Harvey and Angela
Lansbury. I`ve seen Harvey in Butterfeld 8, with Elizabeth
Taylor, and wasn`t too impressed by his stiff, stuffy Brit
mannerisms, but he is right-on in this movie. His character
is repressed (watch him at the beginning of the movie, when
he sees his subordinates frolicking in a Korean whorehouse)
and generally pompous, which makes his situation all the
more convincing. It is obvious that even without his being
trained against his will to be an assassin, Harvey has had
little choice in his life. For one, he has had a long lost
girlfriend whose father was one of his mother`s bitter political
enemies, and, of course, he had his wonderful situation
with these two people ruined by his mother, which creates
much bitterness and anguish at his loveless and lonely life.
These two people resurface, only to be unwitting parties
to even more cruel acts against them, to put it mildly.
No other character or actor could say the words Harvey says
about his past without sounding a bit ridiculous, but he
gets away with it, because we know this is the most he has
come to expressing himself fully. Lansbury is great as well,
and a surprise to those who only know her as her beloved
Jessica Fletcher. With this movie and her performance in
Gaslight, Lansbury proved she could play decidedly nasty
roles.
Overall,
The Manchurian Candidate is a powerful political thriller,
and painful proof that they just don`t make them like they
used to.
David
Macdonald
Site
Contents Copyright© The Z Review, unless used with permission.This
site has no intention to infringe on the rights of the film
owners of The Manchurian Candidate and intellectual copyright holders of the
movies mentioned herein & hold copyright over the movie,
characters, merchandise & storyline.