Don’t
you hate it when the only good parts of a movie have been
shown in the preview? “Man of the House” is
the latest film to commit this cinematic sin. After viewing
the preview, we know that Tommy Lee Jones plays a Texas
Ranger who moves in with a group of cheerleaders to protect
them and that Cedric the Entertainer performs his trademark
dance moves. The mere thought of Tommy Lee Jones and Cedric
the Entertainer together in an action comedy was enough
to pique my curiosity. Throw in a few cheerleading routines
and I’m hooked completely. Sadly, the movie gave me
little else to cheer about.
Jeers
not cheers for the stereotypical depiction of cheerleaders
here – a feisty Latina (Paula Garcés), a dumb
blonde (Kelli Garner), a street-smart Italian (Vanessa Ferlito),
a rhythmic African-American (Christina Milian), a pushy
WASP (Monica Keena). They love to show off their gorgeous
bodies by wearing skimpy clothing – refusing to cover
up until Jones’ character installs a special air conditioning
system. Hints of deeper character development emerge only
when one girl (Garner) develops a crush on Jones and another
(Ferlito) demonstrates hidden intellectual potential. But,
sadly, these “Man of the House” cheerleaders
bear no resemblance to my favorite “Bring It On”
pepsters.
I’m
also disappointed that scenes between Jones (“Men
in Black”) and Cedric the Entertainer (“Serving
Sara”) are few and far between. That’s too bad,
because it’s fun to watch them play off each other
-- Jones with his sarcastic, dry delivery and Cedric with
his amusing effervescence. I wish Cedric, who portrays an
ex-con turned minister, and his gospel choir received more
camera time in “Man of the House.” Whenever
they appear, things liven up considerably.
Another
cast member deserving additional screen time is Anne Archer
(“Clear and Present Danger”). Her sensitive
portrayal of Jones’ love interest, an English Literature
professor, rings true – and it’s a treat to
see this lovely lady back on the big screen. She and Jones
make an appealing couple, one I’d like to see again,
but in a mature romantic comedy.
Directed
by Stephen Herek (Rock Star) from a screenplay and story
by five (!!!) writers, “Man of the House” fails
to deliver much exciting action or laugh-out-loud comedy.
Although both Tommy Lee Jones and Cedric the Entertainer
have earned considerable credit with me because of past
performances, I hope they choose their projects more wisely
in the future.
Despite
a strong cast and a potentially engaging premise, the few
moments of sharp humour in this film just aren't quite enough
to make it work. The filmmakers keep making the most hackneyed
jokes and approaching the material from the most sexist
angles. It really wears you down.
Texas Ranger
Roland Sharp (Jones) is assigned to protect a group of five
cheerleaders who witnessed a brutal killing. But they refuse
to take the situation seriously, and draw Sharp into university
life, including a budding romance with their literature
professor (Archer) and Important Life Lessons about how
to deal with his 17-year-old daughter (Woodward). Meanwhile,
the bad guy (Van Holt) is closing in on them.
The plot is the
basic connect-the-dots thing, without a single surprise.
So it's up to the cast to inject some life into the film.
And they certainly try! The cheerleaders-in-peril gang are
quite funny--charming, endearing, smart and tough, with
Milian as their sassy leader, Garner as the airhead bimbo,
Keena as the brainy blonde, Garcés missing her (unseen)
boyfriend and Ferlito as the rebel. These are the worst
kind of stereotypes, but the cast underplay them as much
as they can, and it works. Comic relief is provided by Cedric's
ex-con/ex-cheerleader minister. And at the centre of the
storm Jones plays it just a bit too straight--grimacing
and growling through most scenes, even though the film's
high points are the moments when he smiles and cracks a
joke.
Herek
knows his way around an irreverent comedy (Bill & Ted's
Excellent Adventure, Rock Star), and the problem is that
this film is simply not irreverent enough. The comedy is
played for the most obvious laughs--bland, cliched, unoriginal--while
the rest is an uneven mix of grisly violence, voyeuristic
camera work and silly set pieces (the requisite makeover,
a preposterous skating sequence). Who's it aimed at anyway?
So when a rare zinger leaps out and makes us laugh, we realise
what an enjoyable film this should have been.