Hastened
by a general shift itself immeasurably the byproduct of
technological advances in cinema and television, a past
innocence and capacity for wonder are dying if not gone.
“The Conquest of Everest,” “The Silent
World,” and Disney’s “Seal Island”
and subsequent “True-Life Adventure” feature
series would probably not stir the current rising generation.
Proof
of the pudding followed the screening of “March of
the Penguins/La Marche de l’empereur,” when
a twenty-something-year-old pronounced Luc Jacquet’s
Warner-National Geographic documentary “not very interesting”
and two youngsters disbelieved adult assurances that no
footage, not even below ice-covered Antarctic waters (by
Patrick Marchand and François de Riberolles), had
been artificially generated. How, one asks, is sensibility
to the marvels and horrors of “true-life” again
to compete with the Virtual Reality of graphics, special
effects and stuntwork?
The
film in question is not without flaws, and the unseen (except
a few end-credit stills) exploits of the crew itself are
perhaps the equal of the actual genetic survival story,
but this is the sort of work that an older generation approves
of and that parents will want their children to see and
appreciate. Super-16mm cameramen Jérôme Maison
and Laurent Chalet (and their equipment) endured thirteen
months, without any possibility of sea or air evacuation,
the same whiteouts, hundred-fifty-mph katabatic winds and
-70°F temperatures, though minus predatory leopard seals,
orcas, giant petrels and skuas, as their flightless aquatic
bird subjects, the stately emperor penguins (Aptenodytes
forsteri).
The
public has grown so accustomed to shallow, wisecracking,
movie star-voiced, cartoonishly anthropomorphized animal
characters, that the stoical, monkish-looking birds seem
deceptively calm, hence “unexciting.” So it
needs to be told that “in some ways this is a story
of survival, of life over death. But it’s more than
that: it’s a story of love,” in Morgan Freeman’s
one-note reading of Jordan Roberts’ scripted narration.
However low-key, the voice is a distraction, a sad emphasis
on human parallels and a lack of confidence that an audience
can be trusted to pick up on elemental, nearly soundless
drama the way it once did with Flaherty’s pre-soundtrack
“Nanook of the North.”
Alex
Wurman’s not easily classifiable faintly jazz score
provides the only accompaniment necessarily suitable for
this stark tragedy-and-triumph saga of instinctual, cyclical
renewal. With one single high-grain aurora australis, the
backdrop is color-drained to a whitish-grey that shimmers
blue, silhouetting the slow-stepping black pilgrim-cowled
penguins with incongruous orange temple spots and pink underbeak
slits. Conceived originally for television, the film had
no script as such, for although what would happen was known
beforehand, the how was incognito.
But
if the actual instinctive mechanisms remain to be discovered,
this penguin colony has likely followed the same migratory
mating and chick-rearing rituals since the tropical continent
drifted as far south as it could go and donned its two-to-three-mile
ice cap. After frolicking and fattening up at sea for the
summer months of January to March, the colony begins a long
trek inland as winter approaches. At the inhospitable breeding
grounds, dignified courtship takes place, and for the cycle
the paired birds stay monogamous and self-sacrificing unto
death for the single egg which is laid, the survival of
which is foreseeably precarious.
The
camera records the beautiful year’s length cycle,
aided by the penguins’ Galapagos unfamiliarity with,
and lack of fear of, man. In immemorial dance of life and
hope, the protective stomach flap is raised and the egg
transferred from atop the exhausted female’s feet
to a similar spot on the male. Having each lost some twenty
of her sixty pounds, the females start the dangerous, single-file,
reverse walk to food in a sea now more distant due to new
coastal ice, while, like seahorses, the males incubate the
egg and fast for the four winter months until, after birth
of the chicks, the mothers return.
Transferring
the chick in the manner of the egg, the male instructs his
own with a song-note for future family recognition and,
half his own body weight gone, sets off on the seaward journey
that will be repeated several times by each parent, until
the surviving fledglings are old and strong enough to be
left to find their own mysterious way to the shore.
Against
this vast whiteness that strangely appears all horizontal
with scant verticality, the elemental drama plays out annually.
Amazing, but true. The story is quiet, but the process and
mere fact of species survival is majestic, and so, again,
the film would have benefited from less Homo sapiens voice
and fewer humanizing judgments about “our tuxedoed
friends”: the taciturn, stiff-feathered stars are
perfectly capable of making it on their own.
In one
of the most inhospitable places on earth a journey is taken
each year, and until now it was nearly impossible to see
it happening. With remarkable dedication Luc Jacquet and
a full film crew set up in Antarctica for thirteen months
to watch the reproduction cycle of the emperor penguin.
I am certain that there was enough happening with the crew
to fill a documentary as well, but this film focuses entirely
upon the birds, which live in the water all but the time
they must leave in order to reproduce. March of the Penguins
is a rewarding film, but the journey can be a slow and often
difficult one to watch.
Beginning in March the penguins all begin to jump out of
the water and start their journey. Perhaps one of the strangest
and most beautiful images in the film is of the penguins
as they journey to the breeding ground. They travel in a
single file line, walking nearly the entire way, occasionally
sliding on their belly. The area that they are traveling
to is seventy miles from their starting point and it takes
them nearly a week to get there. The reason for this particular
spot is tradition, each year the same, but it is an apparent
choice because of the slight shelter by mountains and thick
ice as well. Once the penguins finally all reach the destination,
they begin to pair off. There are less males than females,
so some fights occur, but eventually they are paired off
as best as possible.
This is only the beginning of the journey for these penguins.
Even after the eggs are laid the journey is not near over.
The egg is passed on to the male, because if the female
doesn’t get back to the water to eat she will die
of starvation, and so will the young penguin when it is
born. As the young penguin is born the father and mother
must continue to journey back and forth over the entire
summer, providing food for themselves and their offspring.
There are so many elements that can harm the egg and the
penguin in this journey, and nearly 80 percent of the young
penguins do not even make it. If the mother is eaten by
a predator and does not return, the bird dies. If the egg
cracks in the horrible weather, all life within it is gone
in seconds. The wind reaches 100 mph and the temperature
is often –58 in the sun. There are so many ways that
we must watch the penguins fail, it is both miraculous to
see that some do survive and disheartening to have to watch
the sadness of these amazing animals.
There is certainly nothing like this film, the grandeur
and the humor is shocking at times, watching a world completely
unlike anyone has seen before. The score by Alex Wurman
trots along with the story, adding humor to the right moments
and sentimentality when it is needed as well, complimenting
the amazing photography of the natural habitats. This is
definitely one of the most amazing stories in theaters this
summer, although it isn’t the most action packed.
It is a film which will take some patience, although it
definitely promises great rewards.
Ryan Izay
Honestly,
we know a documentary about penguins will be entertaining
simply because they're so silly. And big-screen nature docs
always look marvellous. So we're guaranteed an enjoyable
85 minutes, and this film certainly delivers that. Although
it's not, actually, that exceptional.
The
film charts the nine-month annual cycle of the emperor penguins
of Antarctica, beginning with their 70-mile march from the
sea to their mating grounds, then the torturous months as
the males and females take turns caring for their chicks,
while the other treks back to the sea for food. All in the
most punishing winter on the planet. It's an astonishing
side of nature--you wonder how a species could survive this
kind of existence. And yet they seem almost happy about
it.
And
this is the filmmakers' first mistake. They anthropomorphise
the penguins far too much, giving them hopes and dreams
and love lives, but no sense of humour. Which is a ludicrous
thing to do when the most delightful aspect of a penguin
is its hilarious physicality. The narration is just far
too po-faced, giving us lots of important information but
missing the entire point of the experience: we want to laugh.
(Apparently the original French version dramatises the tale,
giving voices to the penguin characters.)
The
second mistake is to sanitise everything, complete with
slushy score (by Alex Wurman) and genteel voiceover (by
Freeman), so even the few on-screen deaths are given a tragic
nobility. By leaving out the muck, the film feels a bit
fake. But that's not to say it's bad. The cinematography
is absolutely stunning; the crew persistently tracked the
penguins for more than a year, and their ability to get
up close and personal is remarkable. (Stay for the making-of
outtakes in the closing credits.)
This
kind of documentary is thoroughly watchable because the
subject matter is so engaging. Seeing these people-like
birds tenaciously follow an essential but brutal rite of
passage is fascinating. Chuckling at their ridiculous physicality
is great fun. But if the filmmakers had tipped over into
full-on comedy or poop-and-all nature, or maybe both, it
could have been something unforgettable.