I find
movies based on musicals I've enjoyed to be among the most
difficult to judge fairly. Why? Because if I liked the musical,
it's probably due in large part to how much I enjoyed the
music. And no matter how they make the movie version, that
music is likely to carry over, giving me at least one sure
reason to smile as I watch. For instance, take “Chicaco”--
the movie itself is still one I wouldn't call great, but
the songs are infectious to me. The only tradeoff comes
with who's singing the songs, and, in that movie's case,
Catherine Zeta-Jones's fiery renditions trump the not-so-impressive
versions delivered by Richard Gere.
So what about
“Rent”? The job here seems doubly difficult
because the songs are performed by most of the original
Broadway cast. Taye Diggs, Wilson Jermaine Heredia, Jesse
L. Martin, Idina Menzel, Adam Pascal, and Anthony Rapp --
they're the voices I'm already used to from listening to
the Broadway soundtrack on CD. And the two replacements
more than hold their own -- Tracie Thoms is an amazing find,
and silver screen regular Rosario Dawson makes herself a
strong case for a career in musicals.
It didn't take
long for the music to overwhelm me, reminding me of why
I loved the show. Rock opera-styled songs, fueled by humor,
bitterness, joy, and rage, mythologize themselves with catchy
riffs and playful genre exploration. I remembered how different
and refreshing they were when I had first heard them. By
the time my eyes were tearing up to the words, "There's
only us, no day but today," I thought to myself the
producers could've just filmed the actors on a stage singing
this stuff, and I would've liked it.
Alas, after the
movie was over, I found enough reason to raise a more objective
eye to it. What I noticed, most disappointingly, was how
the story's second act (in the stage show, that would be
it's last hour or so) felt weak and incomplete. It had been
reduced to about the film's last third, and was missing
vital components to the dramatic climb to the climax, most
notably the majority of a song called "Goodbye Love."
As a result, "Rent" ends on a much tamer note
than it does on stage. These pulled punches have a more
damaging effect on the story's dramatic arc than one might
initially suspect.
Much of the film’s
appeal comes from its relatively harsh, unapologetic view
of realities -- after all, this was a musical that centered
on the poor, featured major homosexual characters, and looked
the AIDS crisis in square in the eye. Humble doses of hope
and love only look that much brighter emerging from deeper,
darker caverns.
I might call
Chris Columbus's direction unimaginative, but at first it
makes some sense -- he uses plenty of circling, tracking
shots that focus on the performers and otherwise tries not
to get in the way. However, you can feel him being caught
in the exuberance of the numbers in the first half, as these
are the ones that are choreographed and shot with a sense
of spirit (albeit rather straightforwardly).
But “Rent”
should be one part joy and two parts pain; from Columbus's
focus, you wouldn't be able to tell this. The descent of
the central relationship between Roger (Pascal) and Mimi
(Dawson) feels glossed over when it should have hit the
hardest. “Rent” is about small, personal triumphs
in the faces of oppressive forces from every direction --
health, economics, big commerce, and the personal tendencies
toward self-alienation as a coping mechanism. The fact that
I couldn't feel this punch in the gut, like I had after
seeing it on stage, meant something was lacking. The movie
overdosed on its lighter side, softballing the grittier
aspects of its tale.
Yes, you could
say this feeling might've come from my familiarity with
the material -- if I know what's coming, I minimize the
impact. But I could counter by saying I can get more emotionally
involved by listening to my CD sountrack again. Yet, “Rent”
the movie still adds up to something special -- if nothing
else, it's now a revisitable, visually represented document
of a very good show, with juice supplied by the commitments
of many of the original players (although almost a decade
older). I woudn't say it's magic as a movie all its own,
but it does remind me of the magic I experienced not so
long ago.