The
Time Machine Movie Review:
Wow!
A big studio remake of the H.G. Wells adventure The Time
Machine, with great special effects and Guy Pearce as the
traveler himself! Imagine the possibilities! Imagine the
excitement! Imagine the wonder! Imagine how completely uninspired
it could be! No, wait... strike that last one, since that's
the only thing you need not imagine about this flat, joyless
exercise in fantasy storytelling.
Guy Pearce is indeed our hero, Alexander Hartdegen, who
comes across more as a turn of the century absent-minded
professor than a brilliant scientific genius. He lives in
the year 1899, in that part of New York City where everyone
still speaks with an English accent. Through a tragic turn
of events not included in the original story, he is motivated
to construct a time machine of, you guessed it, his own
invention. His goal... to change the past!
The scenes that follow are often visually interesting, but
include only a bare minimum of actual plot to back them
up. The main problem is that, by giving Alexander a very
emotional motivation for traveling through time, the screenwriter
has given the impression that there will be some character
development involved in resolving his problems. Not only
is there no character development, but no plot resolution,
since the rest of the events unfold in ways relatively faithful
to the H.G. Wells adventure story. The result is that we
are simply along for the ride, with no reason to really
care about Alexander or his paradoxical plight. After a
while, Alexander even seems to forget why he wanted to time
travel in the first place!
Since the screenplay already changes this story around,
I would have liked to have seen some more original aspects.
How did Alexander construct his machine? Where did he get
the materials? Why was it constructed the way it was? Were
there any test-runs or failed attempts to time travel? Sadly,
none of these ideas are explored in the movie.
Now, by this time you may have the impression that I really
hated this movie, but I didn't. It's not an entirely bad
film, it's just incredibly flawed.
I did enjoy nearly everything that took place in Alexander's
own time, during the first half-hour of the movie. Also,
I was very surprised with Orlando Jones, whose character
turns out to be both funny and tragic at the same time.
Fans of irony will appreciate that Orlando Jones' character,
a computerized holographic database, carries more emotional
impact than any other character in the film! In addition,
a cameo appearance by Jeremy Irons yields some entertaining
moments, even though his character only serves to point
out details to Alexander that are all too obvious to everyone
in the audience.
The visual effects were also very good, but not spectacular.
Unfortunately, a bit of spectacle is exactly what this film
could have used. Too bad, since in the hands of a more imaginative
filmmaker, this could have been a great movie. So, if you
decide to see The Time Machine, that's entirely up to you.
Just remember that it's a decision you won't be able to
go back and erase!
Allen Vestal
The
question of time travel has always electrified the curiosity
within man's mind. Where would we journey? Who would we
like to meet? Would we change part of our own past so that
we could have a better life now? And if so, can we?
When
legendary science-fiction writer H.G. Wells wrote his famous
novel "The Time Machine" in the late 1800s, he
became one of the first writers to bring these questions
to the masses. Wells' reluctant hero in the novel, Professor
Alexander Hartdegen (played by Guy Pearce in the new film)
is plagued by one of the questions above. Alex's poor dilemma
and journey begins when Alex tries to answer the question,
"Can we change time and if not, why?"
Professor,
inventor and teacher Alexander Hartdegen is on the verge
of a blissful life. Alex has a beautiful fiancée,
Emma (Sienna Guillory), a wealthy mansion and a career few
men can aspire to. On one fateful evening and in the blink
of an eye, Alex loses all he holds close to his heart. The
tragedy sends Alex into a tailspin that brings him to spend
countless hours working on an unsolvable problem. Alex eventually
overcomes the problem and builds himself a vehicle which
will take him back in time to prevent the horrific event
in his past from happening. To Alex's dismay he can't change
that event and is further frustrated to why he can't.
Alex
decides that there has to be a point in the future where
man has answered and solved his dilemma. Alex shifts the
lever and sends his machine on a whirlwind tour through
humanity's future. Alex's journey echoes what it would be
like if "Father Time" had a TV remote and hit
the fast-forward button. Stopping some 800,000 years from
our future, Alex discovers the second evolution of man and
finds a new cause in which he can be passionate about.
This
version of the classic H.G. Wells novel is a lot different
than the famous George Pal version of 1960 which starred
Rod Taylor as Hartdegen. This version is a lot flashier
and goes for the fun buried within the story. This film
isn't for the cerebral science-fiction fan but for the fans
of the "popcorn-science fiction" films. Huge crowd-pleasers
like "Independence Day", "Stargate"
and "Armageddon" are perfect examples of popcorn-sci-fi.
Director Simon Wells (great-grandson of the novel's author
H.G. Wells) sends his audience through a whirlwind of journey
before his story slows down in the far distant future. The
whirlwind in the front of the film which involves two minor
pit stops really bugged me. The film seemed to be in such
a hurry to get to where it was going. Why not let Hartdegen
get out and explore some of these other places in time?
The film needed to expand on Hartdegen's quest during his
journey to the future. Time travel is supposed to be fun
and adventurous. So why didn't they explore that?
I loved
Hartdegen's scenes with Orlando Jones's cocky computer persona.
These are priceless in this film. Jones's is such a scene
stealer and it's his presence in this film that makes the
duller moments a lot of fun.
The showcase performance in this piece is the eerie white-skinned
Jeremy Irons as the twisted leader of cavernous and cannibalistic
Morlocks. Jeremy Irons is captivating as the insane cave-dweller.
His performance and presence reminded me a lot of how mean
and evil Jaye Davidson was as Ra in "Stargate".
Both Irons and Davidson had very little screen time to work
with but were able to bring forth unforgettable villainous
performances.
I love "time-travel" films and television. My
favorite of the films is the "Back to the Future Trilogy"
because I connected with those films when they first came
out. I could never put my finger on why those were so influential
to so many. After seeing "Time Machine", I have
an idea. The Back to the Future films had heart and fleshed
out the quest and mission of its characters. The film never
really gives Hartdegen any sort of passion or drive which
is needed for this character's desperation. Hartdegen and
his journey needed to be fleshed out more to make this the
film what it should have been.
Academy
Award winning makeup artist Stan Winston does a marvelous
job with the film's Morlocks. Except with some slight eye
problems, Winston's Morlocks are very impressive. There
is a scene that so closely resembles "Planet of the
Apes" that it's very scary. Another impressive aspect
was the amazing time machine itself. It is amazing how literally
translated it was from the novel.
The
debut of UK pop sensation Samantha Mumba didn't do much
for me. She plays as a scantily clad native girl and that
was about all she needed for the role. It really isn't a
break-out role. Nuff said!
I really
enjoyed the escapism and kinetic energy housed within "Time
Machine". It's purely escapism fun. A lot like the
Tim Burton's revisualization of "Planet of the Apes",
Simon Wells has re-envisioned the classic novel.
(3.5
of 5)
So Says
the Soothsayer.
Dean
Kish
Site
Contents Copyright© The Z Review, unless used with permission.This
site has no intention to infringe on the rights of the film
owners of The Time Machine and intellectual copyright holders of the
movies mentioned herein & hold copyright over the movie,
characters, merchandise & storyline.