This
movie is NOT for the birds. But it IS about them. And, as
well, about life and death, and community, loyalty and love.
Walking a fine line this side of the sticky sweet, it is
a gentle, and unusual, non-fiction. Its subject is a gentle
and unusual man who drifts to his own genius and, in an
unlikely way, finds his path and, in the surprise final
moment, his destiny.
Shot on location
without digital effects, not on video but 16 mm film enlarged
to somewhat grainy 35 for release, Judy Irving’s “The
Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill” will strike some as
merely cute in a lower key. Others, however, and probably
a minority, will find this throwback to ‘sixties spirituality
an effectively simple statement, distinct from “the
environmental movies I’d been making,” of Zen
Master Suzuki-roshi’s metaphor of the individual living
droplets’ returning to cosmic oceans.
Now running to
a paunch, bespectacled, jeaned and ponytailed -- vacuuming,
he reveals that it will remain unshorn until he has a girlfriend
-- Mark Bittner left behind Washington State and writing
ambitions and, after travel overseas, gravitated to San
Francisco with his guitar. The music didn’t work out,
either, and a series of menial jobs interfered with “freedom
to move ahead in a spiritual way, Buddhist ‘right
behavior,’” so he stopped, living on the streets
catch-as-catch-can for fifteen years and in any case has
paid no rent for a quarter-century.
These facts come
out later, here and there in no particular order. When Irving
dubiously approached him about a short film to be done on
stock left over from another project, he was an accepted
squatter in an overgrown Greenwich Steps cottage on Telegraph
Hill’s eastern steeps. He struck her as an inarticulate
hermit, and, anyway, “how far could you go with one
guy feeding some parrots?” But the filmmaker was drawn
in, and the ad-hoc casualness with which story and varied
cast develop, belies the following four-and-a-half years
spent in production.
After opening-credit
pans of colorful raucous bird flocks and foggy Bay Area
land- and seascapes -- which will recur, particularly symbolic
Alcatraz -- the “sort of St. Francis of Telegraph
Hill, huh?” looks for Fannie, pampers a host of wild
cherry-headed conures (red-masked parakeets) and patiently
explains to amused but increasingly impressed tourists.
Switch to his
place, where open cages house only the damaged birds that
he takes in, apart from a banded cantankerous Mingus for
whom punishment is being left outside. Charming, almost
purposely amateurish close-ups of these parrots, or of others
on the porch, the Hill or in parks, are accompanied by comments
from other people, professional curators as well as plain
amateur fans, but Bittner’s reassuring voice is the
glue.
Untrained, he
stumbled into the whole thing but, Robert Stroud-like, through
observation, kindness and questions has become an untitled
expert. Discussing his friends and charges named Gibson,
Flap, Fannie and Tupelo (both dead), blue-crowned Connor
and Buckie, Picasso and Sophie, Pushkin, Olive, Scrapper
and Scrapperella, he opens up, revealing his humanity, a
wealth of shrewd reasoning, and an awareness of the similarities
between the animal kingdom and higher-animal man. Not at
all the eccentric he once feared being taken for, he becomes
a naturalist-philosopher of the need for community and affection.
With Beat figure
Whitman, he realizes that any creature is “equally
perfect journey-work of the stars,” that death is
“different from what any one supposed” and part
of the plan, and that loss can also be beginning. Number
243 needs extensive structural renovation, will in the future
be rental property -- and, cured of humankind’s “anthropocentrism,”
the man is ready to move on, in sorrow and in greater joy.