Will
It Snow For Christmas? Movie Review:
As
the Christmas season approaches, people turn their minds
to happier thoughts of friends and family, as well as more
materialistic concerns. Cinematically, the sorts of films
which people turn to again and again range from the Capra
fantasy of It`s a Wonderful Life to the animated version
of How The Grinch Stole Christmas. In both cases, the idea
of Christmas represents a larger belief of the ultimate
warmth and kindness within humankind.
But
I`ve dug up a little nugget from my local independent video
store which is not some lovely little Christmas flick, even
as its title asks the question that everyone asks during
the month of December - Will it Snow for Christmas? The
sight of snow is evident in this picture, and the very end
of the film does take place on Christmas Eve, but there
is little holiday cheer. That`s because the film depicts
the most grim and subtle of abuse that could possibly be
inflicted upon innocent people.
In
what appears to be a very remote area of France lives what
appears, on the outside, to be a fairly normal image of
rural country life - the family farm. We see adults, and
children, as well as other locals, help in bringing in the
crops for the year, and so we think that things are as they
should be. But this normalcy disguises a tragic and appalling
set-up, as the truth is that this residence is closer to
a forced labour camp than a family farm. There is a mother
and (a lot of) children, but the mother is not married to
the father. The father runs the farm, but does not live
with the rest of the family, and instead lives in a nice
house somewhere else in the province - with his wife and
kids! The mother and kids, on the other hand, live in squalor
(they don`t even have proper heating), but are tied to the
owner, because without him, they would not have a place
to stay, and a single mother with a huge number of children
would not be able to have what little she does have by herself.
Hatred
and anger simmer within virtually everyone in this household.
The children feel and express it most, never once behaving
as if they actually love this guy. They hate him, and this
is obvious to everyone. On the days when he is not terrorizing
them (he freaks out at one kid over something involving
a water-line which the kid would not have been in a position
to be aware about in the first place), the children are
more happy, because it feels like freedom.
The
mother`s actions, however, are a little more questionable
at first. In fact, she still sleeps with this monster sometimes,
which begs the question of whether she is a slave to him
in more ways than one. Later on, her anger develops, and
we believe that she will finally pack up and leave with
the children. But soon the evidence seem to suggest that
this is a cycle of behaviour that constantly gets repeated.
I
cannot truthfully say that I was immensely entertained by
this film - even at 90 minutes, the movie moves very slowly,
and does not implement any of the usual melodramatic cues,
except for the falsely happy ending. Therefore, there aren`t
a lot of high points in the film, because we aren`t being
told a story so much as being presented a situation, much
like an unintrusive documentary would do. The people work
on the fields, have their meals, while angers simmer and
sometimes explode, and this is presented authentically;
a slice-of-life without the elements to make the story larger
than life. That`s an interesting fact when one considers
that the premise is shocking and outrageous. Somehow we
believe that this could never happen, but I suppose it could
be possible. The situation is an example of the exploitation
of poor people for richer individuals` benefits: the father
obviously sired all these children for the purpose of creating
more workers without the strain of having to pay them wages
(he also has immigrants, no doubt nearly as impoverished,
hanging around the property. What a true capitalist!), while
giving the excuse that, hey, you have a house of your own
and have heat.... sometimes! The family is unable to get
out because they would not be able to last on their own.
If the mother wanted to live for herself, she`d have to
give up her children, something she does not want to do.
And, just as with any capitalist, the father would most
likely never be punished for what he`s doing. Who would
charge a man who has a family farm, and whose children work
with him, and who live in his property? Like I said before,
on the outside, everything looks normal.
I
always enjoy finding movies like this, not because they
will become classics, but just for the experience of saying
that I was lucky enough to see something different or interesting.
Will it Snow for Christmas? is a good example of a film
which was certainly very different, and was very interesting,
although fairly difficult as well.
David
Macdonald
Site
Contents Copyright© The Z Review, unless used with permission.This
site has no intention to infringe on the rights of the film
owners of Will It Snow For Christmas? and intellectual copyright holders of the
movies mentioned herein & hold copyright over the movie,
characters, merchandise & storyline.